Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8296900: CertificateValidity fields are not optional #11126

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wangweij
Copy link
Contributor

@wangweij wangweij commented Nov 13, 2022

Make two fields inside CertificateValidity final.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8296900: CertificateValidity fields are not optional

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11126/head:pull/11126
$ git checkout pull/11126

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11126
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11126/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11126

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11126

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11126.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 13, 2022

👋 Welcome back weijun! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 13, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 13, 2022

@wangweij The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 13, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 13, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@mcpowers mcpowers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me.

@seanjmullan
Copy link
Member

Typo in bug summary, change to "CertificateValidity fields are not optional"

@wangweij wangweij changed the title 8296900: CertificateValidity fields are not be optional 8296900: CertificateValidity fields are not optional Nov 14, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2022

@wangweij This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8296900: CertificateValidity fields are not optional

Reviewed-by: mullan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 30 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c472e4: 8294217: Assertion failure: parsing found no loops but there are some
  • 0fe2bf5: 8296805: ctw build is broken
  • e1d298c: 8296741: Illegal X400Address and EDIPartyName should not be created
  • b0edfc1: 8164464: Consistent failure of java/awt/dnd/MissingEventsOnModalDialog/MissingEventsOnModalDialogTest.java
  • 9c39932: 8294899: Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process on Windows returns an exit code of 259
  • 3f401b3: 8296670: G1: Remove unused G1GCPhaseTimes::record_preserve_cm_referents_time_ms
  • 68301cd: 8296665: IGV: Show dialog with stack trace for exceptions
  • 277f0c2: 8296821: compiler/jvmci/jdk.vm.ci.code.test/src/jdk/vm/ci/code/test/NativeCallTest.java fails after JDK-8262901
  • 34d10f1: 8296243: [IR Framework] Fix issues with IRNode.ALLOC* regexes
  • 8eb90e2: 8296797: java/nio/channels/vthread/BlockingChannelOps.testSocketChannelWriteAsyncClose failed with ClosedChannelException
  • ... and 20 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/27527b49752110fcfca285a1b6dd995d5d103fe5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 14, 2022
@wangweij
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

1 similar comment
@wangweij
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2022

Going to push as commit a7c2338.
Since your change was applied there have been 34 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3eb789a: 8296171: Compiler incorrectly rejects code with variadic method references
  • 749335d: 8291911: java/io/File/GetXSpace.java fails with "53687091200 != 161051996160"
  • 95b8405: 8296431: PushbackInputStream should override transferTo
  • e269dc0: 8293681: ResponseAPDU getData() method javadoc
  • 8c472e4: 8294217: Assertion failure: parsing found no loops but there are some
  • 0fe2bf5: 8296805: ctw build is broken
  • e1d298c: 8296741: Illegal X400Address and EDIPartyName should not be created
  • b0edfc1: 8164464: Consistent failure of java/awt/dnd/MissingEventsOnModalDialog/MissingEventsOnModalDialogTest.java
  • 9c39932: 8294899: Process.waitFor() throws IllegalThreadStateException when a process on Windows returns an exit code of 259
  • 3f401b3: 8296670: G1: Remove unused G1GCPhaseTimes::record_preserve_cm_referents_time_ms
  • ... and 24 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/27527b49752110fcfca285a1b6dd995d5d103fe5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 14, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 14, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 14, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2022

@wangweij Pushed as commit a7c2338.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2022

@wangweij The command integrate can only be used in open pull requests.

@wangweij wangweij deleted the 8296900 branch November 14, 2022 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants