Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8297449: Update JInternalFrame Metal Border code #11305

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk commented Nov 23, 2022

Updated Metal Border code for JInternalFrame.

  • Added instanceof check before casting Graphics to G2D.
  • Replaced roundHalfDown with Region.clipRound()

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11305/head:pull/11305
$ git checkout pull/11305

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11305
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11305/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11305

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11305

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11305.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 23, 2022

👋 Welcome back honkar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 23, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 23, 2022

@honkar-jdk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 23, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 23, 2022

Webrevs

for (int i = 0; i <= thickness; i++) {
g.drawRect(i, i, width - (i * 2), height - (i * 2));
}
if (g instanceof Graphics2D) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's not the right approach. You should separate the parts of code into those which require Graphics2D (resetting transform, stroke width) and those which don't, so that the border is still painted even when g is not an instance of Graphics2D.

Take a look at how @alisenchung handled it for EtchedBorder:

if (g instanceof Graphics2D) {
Graphics2D g2d = (Graphics2D) g;
at = g2d.getTransform();
oldStk = g2d.getStroke();
// if m01 or m10 is non-zero, then there is a rotation or shear
// skip resetting the transform
resetTransform = (at.getShearX() == 0) && (at.getShearY() == 0);
if (resetTransform) {
g2d.setTransform(new AffineTransform());
stkWidth = (int) Math.floor(Math.min(at.getScaleX(), at.getScaleY()));
g2d.setStroke(new BasicStroke((float) stkWidth));
}
}

The border is still rendered even if the passed in Graphics is not Graphics2D.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@honkar-jdk honkar-jdk Nov 23, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aivanov-jdk Makes sense. Thanks for reviewing. Will check and make the necessary code changes.

at = g2d.getTransform();
scaleFactor = at.getScaleX();
oldColor = g2d.getColor();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Color wasn't preserved before JDK-8015739.

Getting and setting the color doesn't require Graphics2D, so, if it's to be preserved, it should be preserved outside of instanceof.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aivanov-jdk Updated the code. Removed color preservation code to match previous code (before JDK-8015739 changes).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 30, 2022

@honkar-jdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8297449: Update JInternalFrame Metal Border code

Reviewed-by: aivanov, kizune

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 150 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9f94cbe: 8271519: java/awt/event/SequencedEvent/MultipleContextsFunctionalTest.java failed with "Total [200] - Expected [400]"
  • c70d1e1: 8296710: Update to use jtreg 7.1
  • 4899d78: 8293294: Remove dead code in Parse::check_interpreter_type
  • 5459b11: 8297033: G1: Improve logging for Remembered Sets
  • c6156f9: 8297561: Redundant index check in String.offsetByCodePoints()
  • eec24aa: 8295350: JFR: Add stop methods for recording streams
  • 9430f3e: 8297934: [BACKOUT] Compiler should only use verified interface types for optimization
  • 2cb64a7: 8294943: Implement record patterns in enhanced for
  • fc9d419: 8297928: Update jdk.internal.javac.PreviewFeature.Feature to reflect JEP 432 and JEP 433
  • b60cce6: 8297118: Change IncompatibleClassChangeError to MatchException for exhaustive switch statements and switch expressions
  • ... and 140 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fb6c992f325981c42c7f75109a6c9db7ca8715d8...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 30, 2022
@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2022

Going to push as commit 0962957.
Since your change was applied there have been 150 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9f94cbe: 8271519: java/awt/event/SequencedEvent/MultipleContextsFunctionalTest.java failed with "Total [200] - Expected [400]"
  • c70d1e1: 8296710: Update to use jtreg 7.1
  • 4899d78: 8293294: Remove dead code in Parse::check_interpreter_type
  • 5459b11: 8297033: G1: Improve logging for Remembered Sets
  • c6156f9: 8297561: Redundant index check in String.offsetByCodePoints()
  • eec24aa: 8295350: JFR: Add stop methods for recording streams
  • 9430f3e: 8297934: [BACKOUT] Compiler should only use verified interface types for optimization
  • 2cb64a7: 8294943: Implement record patterns in enhanced for
  • fc9d419: 8297928: Update jdk.internal.javac.PreviewFeature.Feature to reflect JEP 432 and JEP 433
  • b60cce6: 8297118: Change IncompatibleClassChangeError to MatchException for exhaustive switch statements and switch expressions
  • ... and 140 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fb6c992f325981c42c7f75109a6c9db7ca8715d8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2022

@honkar-jdk Pushed as commit 0962957.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants