New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8252981: ObjectMonitor::object() cleanup changes extracted from JDK-8247281 #114
Conversation
/contributor add erik.osterlund@oracle.com |
👋 Welcome back dcubed! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@dcubed-ojdk Could not parse
|
@dcubed-ojdk Could not parse
|
@dcubed-ojdk The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request: When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an RFR email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the |
/contributor add Erik Österlund erik.osterlund@oracle.com |
@dcubed-ojdk |
@dcubed-ojdk |
/label remove hotspot,serviceability |
@dcubed-ojdk The |
@fisk - Please chime in on this review when you get the chance. |
/sponsor |
@dcubed-ojdk This change does not need sponsoring - the author is allowed to integrate it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks okay to me (but it's late and I don't want to formally review it yet). Building with all three {release,fastdebug,slowdebug} is usually useful to catch oop conversion problems early.
Looks good to me. |
/integrate |
@dcubed-ojdk Your merge request cannot be fulfilled at this time, as your changes failed the final jcheck:
|
/integrate |
@dcubed-ojdk Your merge request cannot be fulfilled at this time, as your changes failed the final jcheck:
|
/reviewers 2 |
@dcubed-ojdk |
/integrate |
@dcubed-ojdk Your merge request cannot be fulfilled at this time, as your changes failed the final jcheck:
|
@dcubed-ojdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. In addition to the automated checks, the change must also fulfill all project specific requirements After integration, the commit message will be:
Since the source branch of this PR was last updated there have been 5 commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid automatic rebasing, please merge ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
@dcubed-ojdk Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit e7a1b9b. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This is a trivial review request. This changeset was tested with Mach5 Tier[1-3],4,5,6,7,8
testing along with JDK-8252980 and JDK-8247281.
Since Erik and I are both contributors, we will need one other reviewer.
This sub-task is tracking ObjectMonitor::object() cleanup changes
extracted from Erik's work on JDK-8247281. This extraction is done
to ease the code review for the JDK-8247281 changes.
Here's the core cleanup:
diff -r fd7f6a424cd1 src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.hpp
--- a/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.hpp Fri Aug 28 16:43:09 2020 -0400
+++ b/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.hpp Wed Sep 02 17:22:56 2020 -0400
@@ -328,9 +328,9 @@
public:
void release_set_allocation_state(AllocationState s);
void set_allocation_state(AllocationState s);
AllocationState allocation_state() const;
and those type changes ripple into the other files.
Note: The type for the ObjectMonitor::_object field is intentionally not
being changed from "void*" in this changeset. That will be done in JDK-8247281.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Contributors
<erik.osterlund@oracle.com>
<daniel.daugherty@oracle.com>
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/114/head:pull/114
$ git checkout pull/114