-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8291830: jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefine failed: assert(!is_null(v)) failed: narrow klass value can never be zero #11444
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…(v)) failed: narrow klass value can never be zero
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Coleen,
This looks good.
Wow, it is great you've found the root cause!
It was not easy for sure.
Thanks,
Serguei
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 229 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks Serguei! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks for reviewing Serguei, Erik. Kim, thank you for the cleaner implementation with swap and for reviewing. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit fb6fd03.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
The code for RedefineVerifyMark in redefinition replaces the OopHandle mirror so that the verification has the right mirror, but it really should just copy it. Replacing an OopHandle in the ClassLoaderData didn't set the has_modified_oops flag so GC wasn't noticing that this handle is old.
Tested with tier1-4 and tier6 in progress (linux-x64 and windows-x64 done).
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11444/head:pull/11444
$ git checkout pull/11444
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11444
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11444/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11444
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11444
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11444.diff