Skip to content

8298567: Make field in RandomAccessFile final #11632

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

minborg
Copy link
Contributor

@minborg minborg commented Dec 12, 2022

This PR proposes making a field in RandomAccessFile final. Also, it modernises a switch statement.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11632/head:pull/11632
$ git checkout pull/11632

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11632
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11632/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11632

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11632

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11632.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 12, 2022

👋 Welcome back pminborg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 12, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2022

@minborg The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 12, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 12, 2022

Webrevs

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

Surprising that RandomAccessFile.fd was not changed to final many years ago. We can do rw at the same time.

Copy link
Contributor

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2022

@minborg This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8298567: Make field in RandomAccessFile final

Reviewed-by: rriggs, chegar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 56c438b: 8297822: De-duplicate code in module jdk.sctp
  • fabda24: 8296389: C2: PhaseCFG::convert_NeverBranch_to_Goto must handle both orders of successors
  • 6c23b4f: 8298480: Remove unused KlassRemSet
  • 8e5c331: 8298471: Parallel: Don't keep alive nmethods in Young GC

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RogerRiggs, @ChrisHegarty) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 12, 2022
Copy link
Member

@ChrisHegarty ChrisHegarty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Dec 12, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 12, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2022

@minborg
Your change (at version 99c147a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@RogerRiggs
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2022

Going to push as commit 81f57d5.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 56c438b: 8297822: De-duplicate code in module jdk.sctp
  • fabda24: 8296389: C2: PhaseCFG::convert_NeverBranch_to_Goto must handle both orders of successors
  • 6c23b4f: 8298480: Remove unused KlassRemSet
  • 8e5c331: 8298471: Parallel: Don't keep alive nmethods in Young GC

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 12, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 12, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 12, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2022

@RogerRiggs @minborg Pushed as commit 81f57d5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants