Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8299500: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.text API docs #11884

Closed

Conversation

justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member

@justin-curtis-lu justin-curtis-lu commented Jan 6, 2023

Removed constructors of primitive wrapper classes (deprecated for removal) for the following

  • java.text.ChoiceFormat
  • java.text.MessageFormat

Replaced with .valueOf() method


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8299500: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.text API docs

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11884/head:pull/11884
$ git checkout pull/11884

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11884
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11884/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11884

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11884

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11884.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back justin-curtis-lu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Jan 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 6, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -307,12 +307,12 @@
* will be the final result of the parsing. For example,
* <blockquote><pre>
* MessageFormat mf = new MessageFormat("{0,number,#.##}, {0,number,#.#}");
* Object[] objs = {new Double(3.1415)};
* Object[] objs = {Double.valueOf(3.1415)};
* String result = mf.format( objs );
* // result now equals "3.14, 3.1"
* objs = null;
Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj Jan 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although this is not related to this fix, this line objs = null is not needed (and is confusing as an example snippet). I'd remove this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, just got rid of it

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8299500: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.text API docs

Reviewed-by: naoto, lancea

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bfd5971: 8299757: Update JCov version to 3.0.14
  • 17a3f0e: 8299275: Add some ClassLoaderData verification code
  • 4ba8122: 8299312: Clean up BarrierSetNMethod
  • 66db0bb: 8299692: G1: Remove unused G1BlockOffsetTable::is_card_boundary
  • 7068457: 8298472: AArch64: Detect Ampere-1 and Ampere-1A CPUs and set default options
  • 500c3c1: 8298730: Refactor subsystem_file_line_contents and add docs and tests
  • 4072412: 8298876: Swing applications do not get repainted coming out of sleep on Windows 10
  • a503ec2: 8299608: Add Register + imm32 orq to x86_64 assembler
  • d2827ec: 8299671: speed up compiler/intrinsics/string/TestStringLatin1IndexOfChar.java
  • 05a0a71: 8297933: [REDO] Compiler should only use verified interface types for optimization
  • ... and 49 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/44be5edf5aa661169c665aa9386e5930a3632524...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@naotoj, @LanceAndersen) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 6, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@LanceAndersen LanceAndersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine Justin, thanks for doing this.

At some point we should convert the examples to be a snippet which we can do at a later time

@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member Author

Looks fine Justin, thanks for doing this.

At some point we should convert the examples to be a snippet which we can do at a later time

Sounds good 👍

@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2023

@justin-curtis-lu
Your change (at version cf833ae) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@naotoj
Copy link
Member

naotoj commented Jan 9, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2023

Going to push as commit cd10c72.
Since your change was applied there have been 59 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bfd5971: 8299757: Update JCov version to 3.0.14
  • 17a3f0e: 8299275: Add some ClassLoaderData verification code
  • 4ba8122: 8299312: Clean up BarrierSetNMethod
  • 66db0bb: 8299692: G1: Remove unused G1BlockOffsetTable::is_card_boundary
  • 7068457: 8298472: AArch64: Detect Ampere-1 and Ampere-1A CPUs and set default options
  • 500c3c1: 8298730: Refactor subsystem_file_line_contents and add docs and tests
  • 4072412: 8298876: Swing applications do not get repainted coming out of sleep on Windows 10
  • a503ec2: 8299608: Add Register + imm32 orq to x86_64 assembler
  • d2827ec: 8299671: speed up compiler/intrinsics/string/TestStringLatin1IndexOfChar.java
  • 05a0a71: 8297933: [REDO] Compiler should only use verified interface types for optimization
  • ... and 49 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/44be5edf5aa661169c665aa9386e5930a3632524...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jan 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 9, 2023

@naotoj @justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit cd10c72.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants