8299978: Remove MethodHandleNatives.getMembers

[cl4es]

This removes MethodHandleNatives.getMembers, which has fallen into disuse.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8299978: Remove MethodHandleNatives.getMembers

Reviewers

• Jorn Vernee (@JornVernee - Reviewer)
• Mandy Chung (@mlchung - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11949/head:pull/11949
$ git checkout pull/11949

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11949
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11949/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11949

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11949

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11949.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back redestad! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@cl4es The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (b1201f01)

[openjdk]

@cl4es This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8299978: Remove MethodHandleNatives.getMembers

Reviewed-by: jvernee, mchung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 437d69a: 8299836: Make user.timezone system property searchable
• c7716a0: 8299571: ZoneRulesProvider.registerProvider() can leave inconsistent state on failure
• 4cd87f1: 8299835: (jrtfs) Unnecessary null check in JrtPath.getAttributes
• 7d3400b: 8299864: ZipFileStore#supportsFileAttributeView(String) doesn't throw NPE

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[cl4es]

Thanks for reviewing!
/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 48c8fb3.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 89d3f3d: 8299125: UnifiedOopRef in JFR leakprofiler should treat thread local oops correctly
• 4b57334: 8278326: Socket close is not thread safe and other cleanup
• 036c808: 8298482: Implement ParallelGC NUMAStats for Linux
• 0ee8cac: 8299672: Enhance HeapDump JFR event
• d716ec5: 8299179: ArrayFill with store on backedge needs to reduce length by 1
• af8d3fb: 8264684: os::get_summary_cpu_info padded with spaces
• 78b1686: 8227257: javax/swing/JFileChooser/4847375/bug4847375.java fails with AssertionError
• 33f3bd8: Merge
• 945ef07: 8299862: OfAddress setter should disallow heap segments
• 636976a: 8299849: Revert JDK-8294461: wrong effectively final determination by javac
• ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d15285f948c5414028790e25b4497d28775eeb54...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@cl4es Pushed as commit 48c8fb3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.