Skip to content

JDK-8300651: Replace NULL with nullptr in share/runtime/ #12094

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

jdksjolen
Copy link
Contributor

@jdksjolen jdksjolen commented Jan 19, 2023

Do the conversion in the share/runtime/ sub-directory and all of its files.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8300651: Replace NULL with nullptr in share/runtime/

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12094/head:pull/12094
$ git checkout pull/12094

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12094
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12094/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12094

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12094

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12094.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 19, 2023

👋 Welcome back jsjolen! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 19, 2023

@jdksjolen The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 19, 2023
@jdksjolen jdksjolen force-pushed the JDK-8300651 branch 2 times, most recently from 730f042 to 188cab6 Compare January 19, 2023 12:38
@jdksjolen jdksjolen marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2023 13:40
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 19, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 19, 2023

Webrevs

@jdksjolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems like uploading the GHA results are failing.

Copy link
Contributor

@robehn robehn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 20, 2023

@jdksjolen This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8300651: Replace NULL with nullptr in share/runtime/

Reviewed-by: rehn, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 82 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 20, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good but a few cases where nullptr should be null in comments for consistency with surrounding changes if nothing else.

Thanks.

@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ class ThreadSelfSuspensionHandshake : public AsyncHandshakeClosure {
};

bool HandshakeState::suspend_with_handshake() {
assert(_handshakee->threadObj() != NULL, "cannot suspend with a NULL threadObj");
assert(_handshakee->threadObj() != nullptr, "cannot suspend with a nullptr threadObj");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use "null" in the message please.

@@ -669,13 +669,13 @@ void vm_exit_during_initialization(Handle exception) {
// If there are exceptions on this thread it must be cleared
// first and here. Any future calls to EXCEPTION_MARK requires
// that no pending exceptions exist.
JavaThread* THREAD = JavaThread::current(); // can't be NULL
JavaThread* THREAD = JavaThread::current(); // can't be nullptr
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change to null please

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ JavaCallWrapper::JavaCallWrapper(const methodHandle& callee_method, Handle recei
debug_only(_thread->inc_java_call_counter());
_thread->set_active_handles(new_handles); // install new handle block and reset Java frame linkage

assert (_thread->thread_state() != _thread_in_native, "cannot set native pc to NULL");
assert (_thread->thread_state() != _thread_in_native, "cannot set native pc to null");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI this assertion message seems wrong and in fact the assertion is redundant so I'm removing it in #12134.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, deleting it to ensure it doesn't accidentally get pushed back in.

static char* iso8601_time(jlong milliseconds_since_19700101, char* buffer,
size_t buffer_length, bool utc = false);

// Fill in buffer with current local time as an ISO-8601 string.
// E.g., YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.mmm+zzzz.
// Returns buffer, or NULL if it failed.
// Returns buffer, or nullptr if it failed.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be "null" to be consistent with L294

// to patch. If we hit the window where the callee has a c2i in the
// from_compiled_entry and the NULL isn't present yet then we lose the race
// from_compiled_entry and the nullptr isn't present yet then we lose the race
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

null for consistency

@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ class JavaThreadIterator : public StackObj {

public:
JavaThreadIterator(ThreadsList *list) : _list(list), _index(0) {
assert(list != NULL, "ThreadsList must not be NULL.");
assert(list != nullptr, "ThreadsList must not be nullptr.");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

null

static VMStructEntry localHotSpotVMStructs[];
// The function to get localHotSpotVMStructs length
static size_t localHotSpotVMStructsLength() NOT_VM_STRUCTS_RETURN_(0);

// The last entry is identified over in the serviceability agent by
// the fact that it has a NULL typeName
// the fact that it has a nullptr typeName
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

null for consistency

@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int _num_mutex;
#ifdef ASSERT
void assert_locked_or_safepoint(const Mutex* lock) {
// check if this thread owns the lock (common case)
assert(lock != NULL, "Need non-NULL lock");
assert(lock != nullptr, "Need non-nullptr lock");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

null for consistency

@robehn
Copy link
Contributor

robehn commented Jan 23, 2023

Looks good but a few cases where nullptr should be null in comments for consistency with surrounding changes if nothing else.

Yes, good. The terminology used by posix is: "null pointer", so using lower case null I think is good.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks.

@jdksjolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Passes tier1.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2023

Going to push as commit 71107f4.
Since your change was applied there have been 87 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2023

@jdksjolen Pushed as commit 71107f4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants