-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8300682: InstanceKlassMiscStatus is a bad name #12106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just minor nits in instanceKlassFlags.hpp.
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just minor nits in instanceKlassFlags.hpp.
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
class ClassLoaderData; | |||
|
|||
class InstanceKlassMiscStatus { | |||
class InstanceKlassFlags { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The macro to prevent multiple inclusions should have the same name as the file after the renaming.
Should we add a comment stating that "Flags" are immutable, and mutable status should be put elsewhere?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh whoops. Thank you for noticing that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was going to put this comment when adding the mutable status class, in a following change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems fine. Thanks.
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks Fred and David. |
Going to push as commit 4562b40.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This patch is to simply rename InstanceKlassMiscStatus to InstanceKlassFlags. This matches the naming for upcoming Field changes that add a FieldFlags class.
Tested with tier1-4.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12106/head:pull/12106
$ git checkout pull/12106
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12106
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12106/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12106
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12106
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12106.diff