Skip to content

JDK-8301163: jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java increase COMPILATION_TIMEOUT for Linux ppc64le #12244

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Jan 27, 2023

On our Linux ppc64le test machines we quite often see compilation timeouts in the test jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java.
(especially when running with fastdebug binaries)
So it probably makes sense to use a higher compilation timeout (maybe factor 2) on this platform.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8301163: jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java increase COMPILATION_TIMEOUT for Linux ppc64le

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12244/head:pull/12244
$ git checkout pull/12244

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12244
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12244/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12244

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12244

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12244.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 27, 2023

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 27, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 27, 2023

@MBaesken The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 27, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 27, 2023

Webrevs

@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
throw new SkippedException("Test is unstable with slowdebug bits "
+ "on macosx-aarch64");
}
if (Platform.isLinux() && Platform.isPPC()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't limit to Linux.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed it, removed the Linux related check.

@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
throw new SkippedException("Test is unstable with slowdebug bits "
+ "on macosx-aarch64");
}
if (Platform.isPPC()) {
COMPILATION_TIMEOUT = COMPILATION_TIMEOUT * 2;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this won't compile. COMPILATION_TIMEOUT is final.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes correct, it cannot be final any more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well it could be final if you would add (Platform.isPPC() ? 2 : 1) * ... to the initialization. But I'm indifferent.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 27, 2023

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8301163: jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java increase COMPILATION_TIMEOUT for Linux ppc64le

Reviewed-by: rrich

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 107e184: 8301179: Replace NULL with nullptr in share/gc/serial/
  • b77abc6: 8301178: Replace NULL with nullptr in share/gc/epsilon/
  • f7da09c: 8301164: Remove unused ResourceStack class
  • 6e4710b: 8300253: Introduce AArch64 nzcv accessors
  • c6b3f2d: 8301129: Link to debuginfo files should only be made after stripping
  • 938b409: 8301133: IGV: NPE occurs when creating a diff graph with a graph in a different folder
  • 0eb1f66: 8298038: [s390] Configure script detects num_cores +1
  • c3ff151: 8301190: [vectorapi] The typeChar of LaneType is incorrect when default locale is tr
  • 7eff578: 8288050: Add support of SHA-512/224 and SHA-512/256 to the PBKDF2 and PBES2 impls in SunJCE provider
  • d6007a3: 8298869: Update ConnectionTest.java for changes to TLS implementation
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/315398c2450e47d9cdb7fac944e35ba6a6aef221...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 27, 2023
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 30, 2023

Going to push as commit cbefe1f.
Since your change was applied there have been 43 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c2ebd17: 6187113: DefaultListSelectionModel.removeIndexInterval(0, Integer.MAX_VALUE) fails
  • 4bd3f0a: 8301088: oopDesc::print_on should consistently use a trailing newline
  • 64b25ea: 8291569: Consider removing JNI checks for signals SIGPIPE and SIGXFSZ
  • 1ff4646: 8298612: Refactor archiving of java String objects
  • d4e9f5e: 8238170: BeanContextSupport remove and propertyChange can deadlock
  • 6475501: 8300208: Optimize Adler32 stub for AVX-512 targets.
  • af564e4: 8299844: RISC-V: Implement _onSpinWait intrinsic
  • 5dfc4ec: 8300140: ZipFile.isSignatureRelated returns true for files in META-INF subdirectories
  • 5c59de5: Merge
  • e5860ef: 8301206: Fix issue with LocaleData after JDK-8300719
  • ... and 33 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/315398c2450e47d9cdb7fac944e35ba6a6aef221...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 30, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 30, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 30, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 30, 2023

@MBaesken Pushed as commit cbefe1f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants