Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8301342: Prefer ArrayList to LinkedList in LayoutComparator #12274

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Jan 28, 2023

There is only add/iterator calls on this list. No removes from the head or something like this. Not sure why LinkedList was used, but ArrayList should be preferred as more efficient and widely used (more chances for JIT) collection


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8301342: Prefer ArrayList to LinkedList in LayoutComparator

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12274/head:pull/12274
$ git checkout pull/12274

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12274
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12274/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12274

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12274

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12274.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 28, 2023

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2023

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 28, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@SWinxy SWinxy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personal preference is that the variables are typed as List<T> xyz = new ArrayList<>();.

@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Prefer ArrayList to LinkedList in LayoutComparator 8301342: Prefer ArrayList to LinkedList in LayoutComparator Jan 30, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 30, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 30, 2023

Webrevs

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

prrace commented Jan 30, 2023

This looks safe but I rather doubt anyone will be able to measure or ever see any performance benefit.
I suggest some manual testing of focus traversal which seems to be the sole user of the containing class.

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I expect some testing to be done before it is pushed.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 30, 2023

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8301342: Prefer ArrayList to LinkedList in LayoutComparator

Reviewed-by: prr, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 115 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3449324: 8301396: Port fdlibm expm1 to Java
  • 3be5317: 8301798: [BACKOUT] jdb ThreadStartRequest and ThreadDeathRequest should use SUSPEND_NONE instead of SUSPEND_ALL
  • e7247b1: 8298872: Update CheckStatus.java for changes to TLS implementation
  • 20579e4: 8299994: java/security/Policy/Root/Root.java fails when home directory is read-only
  • 5962226: 8300891: Deprecate for removal javax.swing.plaf.synth.SynthLookAndFeel.load(URL url)
  • 8b70256: 8301787: java/net/httpclient/SpecialHeadersTest failing after JDK-8301306
  • bccd55b: 8300295: [AIX] TestDaemonDestroy fails due to !is_primordial_thread assertion
  • 7435b27: 8301744: Remove unused includes of genOopClosures.hpp
  • 6f9106e: 8301306: java/net/httpclient/* fail with -Xcomp
  • ac9e046: 8301479: Replace NULL with nullptr in os/linux
  • ... and 105 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/af564e46b006fcd57ec7391cd1438b3b9311b1d6...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 30, 2023
@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2023

Going to push as commit d67bfe2.
Since your change was applied there have been 115 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3449324: 8301396: Port fdlibm expm1 to Java
  • 3be5317: 8301798: [BACKOUT] jdb ThreadStartRequest and ThreadDeathRequest should use SUSPEND_NONE instead of SUSPEND_ALL
  • e7247b1: 8298872: Update CheckStatus.java for changes to TLS implementation
  • 20579e4: 8299994: java/security/Policy/Root/Root.java fails when home directory is read-only
  • 5962226: 8300891: Deprecate for removal javax.swing.plaf.synth.SynthLookAndFeel.load(URL url)
  • 8b70256: 8301787: java/net/httpclient/SpecialHeadersTest failing after JDK-8301306
  • bccd55b: 8300295: [AIX] TestDaemonDestroy fails due to !is_primordial_thread assertion
  • 7435b27: 8301744: Remove unused includes of genOopClosures.hpp
  • 6f9106e: 8301306: java/net/httpclient/* fail with -Xcomp
  • ac9e046: 8301479: Replace NULL with nullptr in os/linux
  • ... and 105 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/af564e46b006fcd57ec7391cd1438b3b9311b1d6...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 5, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 5, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 5, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 5, 2023

@turbanoff Pushed as commit d67bfe2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants