Skip to content

8301813: Bad caret position in error message #12421

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons commented Feb 3, 2023

Please review a trivial update to DocCommentParser and corresponding updates to tests, to fix the caret position in the two forms of the "no tag name found" error message.

The fix is simply to use the overload of erroneous that allows the preferred caret position to be specified. This overload was not available at the time the affected lines were originally written.

The "natural" place to test this is in the doctree tests (that is, TagTest.java) but that test is not set up for easy monitoring of the end-user visible caret, so a new doclet test is created for that. (TestNoTagName.java).

BadPackageCommentTest.java is also affected. It is updated in a manner similar to that in a parallel PR for handling at-escapes. However, the changed caret position will eventually probably cause a minor change conflict that will need to be resolved.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12421/head:pull/12421
$ git checkout pull/12421

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12421
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12421/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12421

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12421

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12421.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 3, 2023

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 3, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler
  • javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 3, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8301813: Bad caret position in error message

Reviewed-by: iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b569742: 8301788: AlgorithmId should keep lowercase characters from 3rd party providers
  • 05ea083: 8301167: Update VerifySignedJar to actually exercise and test verification
  • ecf8842: 8300098: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ConcurrentAssociateTest.java fails with internal timeout when executed with TieredCompilation1/3
  • 7ae447f: 8301095: [s390x] TestDwarf.java fails
  • 9c80b8a: 8299683: [S390X] Problems with -XX:+VerifyStack
  • 8e9b726: 8301599: Serial: Refactor nested closures in DefNewGeneration
  • 7730506: 8299162: Refactor shared trampoline emission logic
  • 522fa13: 8301580: Error recovery does not clear returnResult
  • 7ac2079: 8301025: ClassCastException in switch with generic record
  • 371a0c4: 8301465: Remove unnecessary nmethod arming in Full GC of Serial/Parallel
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e7247b10ccd2bf1ad6809395a1b63aa5046d5b1d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 6, 2023
@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2023

Going to push as commit d53ade1.
Since your change was applied there have been 25 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c01b6e: 8221580: Confusing diagnostic for assigning a static final field in a constructor
  • c129ce4: 8300259: Add test coverage for processing of pending block files in signed JARs
  • b569742: 8301788: AlgorithmId should keep lowercase characters from 3rd party providers
  • 05ea083: 8301167: Update VerifySignedJar to actually exercise and test verification
  • ecf8842: 8300098: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ConcurrentAssociateTest.java fails with internal timeout when executed with TieredCompilation1/3
  • 7ae447f: 8301095: [s390x] TestDwarf.java fails
  • 9c80b8a: 8299683: [S390X] Problems with -XX:+VerifyStack
  • 8e9b726: 8301599: Serial: Refactor nested closures in DefNewGeneration
  • 7730506: 8299162: Refactor shared trampoline emission logic
  • 522fa13: 8301580: Error recovery does not clear returnResult
  • ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e7247b10ccd2bf1ad6809395a1b63aa5046d5b1d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons Pushed as commit d53ade1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons deleted the 8301813.bad-no-tag-pos branch February 6, 2023 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants