-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8301838: PPC: continuation yield intrinsic: exception check not needed if yield succeeded #12450
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back rrich! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
__ ld(R0, _abi0(lr), R1_SP); // Return pc | ||
__ mtlr(R0); | ||
__ blr(); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This newly introduced code is an exact duplicate from below. I would prefer code reuse by treating the "L_pinned" part as "out-of-line". Instead of branching over forward_exception_entry, you could branch back to the return code. If you do so, the pop&return code below becomes obsolete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea. I've done that.
@@ -1980,34 +1980,38 @@ static void gen_continuation_yield(MacroAssembler* masm, | |||
|
|||
Label L_pinned; | |||
|
|||
__ cmpdi(CCR0, R3_RET, 0); | |||
__ cmpwi(CCR0, R3_RET, 0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since I'm at it: the call above returns int
so it is better to use a 32bit compare.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RealLucy please note this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM now.
@reinrich This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 116 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks for the reviews. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 57aef85.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This small enhancement let's the continuation yield intrinsic return if the yield succeeded.
Doing so is ok because there will never be a pending exception if the yield succeeded.
All continuation tests succeeded.
GHA: some cross compiles failed because packages could not be downloaded. I tried to restart these but that didn't work.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12450/head:pull/12450
$ git checkout pull/12450
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12450
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12450/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12450
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12450
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12450.diff