Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8302069: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java update #12472

Conversation

kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls commented Feb 8, 2023

NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java has been problemlisted for a long time (although 8042215 is the wrong bug id).

The originally reported problem ("No reconnection happened") cannot be reproduced, although there are occasional failures when the test is run.

Those failures are more like the connection failures fixed in similar tests (e.g. JDK-8227337), where:
java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table
..is reported, a startup issue, before the notification work, a failure to connect:
at java.management/javax.management.remote.JMXConnectorFactory.connect(JMXConnectorFactory.java:270)
at NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.main(NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java:88)

We should do something similar here, but not such that it affects the deadlock timing. Increase serverTimeout, it needs a longer timeout to permit the initial connect to work reliably (fails occasionally, particularly but not exclusively on Windows debug builds). Not using the test library timeout scaling here as the timeout has to be kept fairly short, to let the test intentionally block the notification handler and try to cause the original issue.

Additional prints to make the test logs hopefully easier to follow, and tried to clarify a few comments that made no sense to me.

Passing on many runs on all platforms.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8302069: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java update

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12472/head:pull/12472
$ git checkout pull/12472

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12472
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12472/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12472

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12472

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12472.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 8, 2023

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 8, 2023

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • jmx
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org jmx jmx-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 8, 2023
@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls changed the title 8042596: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java No reconnection happened 8302069: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java update Feb 8, 2023
@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2023 12:22
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 8, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 8, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 8, 2023

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8302069: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/NotifReconnectDeadlockTest.java update

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, amenkov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 49 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c87a67: 8245654: Add Certigna Root CA
  • 97d0c87: 8302109: Trivial fixes to btree tests
  • 0aeebee: 8301988: VerifyLiveClosure::verify_liveness asserts on bad pointers outside heap
  • 4815566: 8228604: StackMapFrames are missing from redefined class bytes of retransformed classes
  • 5147969: 8272288: Funky multiresolution image breaks graphics context
  • 77ead44: 8302066: Counter _number_of_nmethods_with_dependencies should be atomic.
  • f4b72df: 8282379: [LOOM] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ClassType/invokeMethod/invokemethod011 sometimes fails
  • 7fd440d: 8298868: Update EngineCloseOnAlert.java for changes to TLS implementation
  • 7901f45: 8301260: Add system property to toggle XML Signature secure validation mode
  • 597a9a4: 8301822: BasicLookAndFeel does not need to check for null after checking for type
  • ... and 39 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c61a38212e8d7ab8d9ece4c414dddd5032bfd6aa...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 8, 2023
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 10, 2023

Going to push as commit 1c7b09b.
Since your change was applied there have been 53 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 837d464: 8302125: Make G1 full gc abort the VM after failing VerifyDuringGC verification
  • 723433d: 8302117: IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions flag causes failure in ArchiveHeapTestClass
  • e245620: 8293198: [vectorapi] Improve the implementation of VectorMask.indexInRange()
  • b814cfc: 8178806: Better exception logging in crypto code
  • 8c87a67: 8245654: Add Certigna Root CA
  • 97d0c87: 8302109: Trivial fixes to btree tests
  • 0aeebee: 8301988: VerifyLiveClosure::verify_liveness asserts on bad pointers outside heap
  • 4815566: 8228604: StackMapFrames are missing from redefined class bytes of retransformed classes
  • 5147969: 8272288: Funky multiresolution image breaks graphics context
  • 77ead44: 8302066: Counter _number_of_nmethods_with_dependencies should be atomic.
  • ... and 43 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c61a38212e8d7ab8d9ece4c414dddd5032bfd6aa...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 10, 2023

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 1c7b09b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated jmx jmx-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants