8302127: Remove unused arg in write_ref_field_post#12489
8302127: Remove unused arg in write_ref_field_post#12489albertnetymk wants to merge 1 commit intoopenjdk:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 87 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
|
||
| template <DecoratorSet decorators, typename T> | ||
| inline void G1BarrierSet::write_ref_field_post(T* field, oop new_val) { | ||
| inline void G1BarrierSet::write_ref_field_post(T* field) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So this function isn't applying the "same region" filter that's in the various other places. I wonder if
that's intentional, or a bug?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's safe because card-scanning is always prepared for "uninteresting" oops.
It's used only by Access API; its counterpart in interpreter/c1/c2 checks for null and cross-region additionally. It's not obvious whether the discrepancy is intentional or not though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, it looks okay. Not a hot path I think, so the additional optimization probably isn't important.
|
Thanks for the review. /integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 28f5250.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 28f5250. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Trivial removing dead code.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12489/head:pull/12489$ git checkout pull/12489Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12489$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12489/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12489View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12489Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12489.diff