-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8278965: crash in SymbolTable::do_lookup #12491
Conversation
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional change seems fine. I can't say I can follow the test in detail.
Thanks.
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 37 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like a reasonable fix for the issue described in the CR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Thank you David, Fred and Ioi! |
Going to push as commit 582b943.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Please review this small change to hold the refcount of a super class name while calling handle_parallel_super_load. Contrary to what I wrote in JDK-8298061, the refcount in the Placeholder table should never go to one. I can reproduce this with btree012 occasionally, so this fixes this too.
The include in placeholders.hpp is required to make the gtest compiled since placeholders header file has Symbol::maybe_increment_refcount and decrement calls.
Tested with the graal test that failed, and tier1-7.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12491/head:pull/12491
$ git checkout pull/12491
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12491
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12491/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12491
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12491
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12491.diff