8302226 failure_handler native.core should wait for coredump to finish

[LudwikJaniuk]

Update open/test/failure_handler/src/share/conf/(linux,mac).properties to handle core dumps more correctly.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8302226: failure_handler native.core should wait for coredump to finish

Reviewers

• Erik Joelsson (@erikj79 - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12515/head:pull/12515
$ git checkout pull/12515

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12515
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12515/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12515

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12515

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12515.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back lujaniuk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@LudwikJaniuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (8f4026f6)
• 00: Full (9c79974a)

[erikj79]

/label build

[openjdk]

@LudwikJaniuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8302226: failure_handler native.core should wait for coredump to finish

Reviewed-by: erikj

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 777 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• cd77fcf: 8290822: C2: assert in PhaseIdealLoop::do_unroll() is subject to undefined behavior
• 57c9bc3: 8302335: IGV: Bytecode not showing
• 57fde75: 8302113: Improve CRC32 intrinsic with crypto pmull on AArch64
• b8c9d6c: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false
• dc55a7f: 8302202: Incorrect desugaring of null-allowed nested patterns
• c4ffe4b: 8301494: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/arm
• 4f1cffd: 8302674: Parallel: Remove unused methods in MutableNUMASpace
• c91cd28: 8301481: Replace NULL with nullptr in os/windows
• 47ca577: 8301491: C2: java.lang.StringUTF16::indexOfChar intrinsic called with negative character argument
• 49eb68b: 8296158: Refactor the verification of CDS region checksum
• ... and 767 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/50120396b6cca1219fb5dd42a11e4b29b79bd3bd...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@erikj79) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

@erikj79
The build label was successfully added.

[LudwikJaniuk]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@LudwikJaniuk
Your change (at version 8f4026f) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[erikj79]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 6120319.
Since your change was applied there have been 780 commits pushed to the master branch:

• fef3eab: 8302734: Parallel: Remove unused LGRPSpace::_invalid_region
• ea5bfea: 8302661: Parallel: Remove PSVirtualSpace::is_aligned
• edf238b: 8302635: Race condition in HttpBodySubscriberWrapper when cancelling request
• cd77fcf: 8290822: C2: assert in PhaseIdealLoop::do_unroll() is subject to undefined behavior
• 57c9bc3: 8302335: IGV: Bytecode not showing
• 57fde75: 8302113: Improve CRC32 intrinsic with crypto pmull on AArch64
• b8c9d6c: 8302158: PPC: test/jdk/jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/Fuzz.java: AssertionError: res: false shouldPin: false
• dc55a7f: 8302202: Incorrect desugaring of null-allowed nested patterns
• c4ffe4b: 8301494: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/arm
• 4f1cffd: 8302674: Parallel: Remove unused methods in MutableNUMASpace
• ... and 770 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/50120396b6cca1219fb5dd42a11e4b29b79bd3bd...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@erikj79 @LudwikJaniuk Pushed as commit 6120319.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.