Skip to content

JDK-8302800: Augment NaN handling tests of FDLIBM methods #12644

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jddarcy
Copy link
Member

@jddarcy jddarcy commented Feb 19, 2023

Augment NaN-handling tests to include exotic NaN bit patterns. Assuming this changeset goes back first, I'll update #12608 to follow the same convention afterward.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8302800: Augment NaN handling tests of FDLIBM methods

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12644/head:pull/12644
$ git checkout pull/12644

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12644
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12644/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12644

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12644

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12644.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 19, 2023

👋 Welcome back darcy! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 19, 2023

@jddarcy The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 19, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 19, 2023

Webrevs

@@ -37,6 +38,38 @@
public class Tests {
private Tests(){}; // do not instantiate

static volatile double zero = 0.0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not directly related to this PR and just out of curiosity: is there a reason for this to be volatile and non-final?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment on the PLATFORM_NAN field was mean to address that -- an attempt to make sure the expression to create the platform NaN gets evaluated at runtime rather than being constant-folded at compile time.

@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor

Otherwise LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 21, 2023

@jddarcy This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8302800: Augment NaN handling tests of FDLIBM methods

Reviewed-by: bpb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 47 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5489c82: 8302603: Use Set.of in java.nio.charset.Charset
  • 10b4cc9: 8301627: System.exit and Runtime.exit debug logging
  • db483a3: 8302320: AsyncGetCallTrace obtains too few frames in sanity test
  • 02eb240: 8302846: IGV: Zoom stuck when zooming out on large graphs
  • 92dfa11: 8302863: Speed up String::encodeASCII using countPositives
  • 8b20aa9: 8302981: Fix a typo in the doc comment for java.lang.Record.equals
  • 644fe0a: 8302837: Kernel32.cpp array memory release invokes undefined behaviour
  • 60e6378: 8302977: ZGC: Doesn't support gc/TestVerifySubSet.java
  • fef1910: 8299777: Test runtime/NMT/BaselineWithParameter.java timed out
  • 622f560: 8302886: Parallel: Remove unimplemented methods in ParCompactionManager
  • ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/43cf8b3d8067bc7128c98f86d5f8b6fa8bbed80e...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 21, 2023
@jddarcy
Copy link
Member Author

jddarcy commented Feb 21, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 21, 2023

Going to push as commit dfce4e1.
Since your change was applied there have been 47 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5489c82: 8302603: Use Set.of in java.nio.charset.Charset
  • 10b4cc9: 8301627: System.exit and Runtime.exit debug logging
  • db483a3: 8302320: AsyncGetCallTrace obtains too few frames in sanity test
  • 02eb240: 8302846: IGV: Zoom stuck when zooming out on large graphs
  • 92dfa11: 8302863: Speed up String::encodeASCII using countPositives
  • 8b20aa9: 8302981: Fix a typo in the doc comment for java.lang.Record.equals
  • 644fe0a: 8302837: Kernel32.cpp array memory release invokes undefined behaviour
  • 60e6378: 8302977: ZGC: Doesn't support gc/TestVerifySubSet.java
  • fef1910: 8299777: Test runtime/NMT/BaselineWithParameter.java timed out
  • 622f560: 8302886: Parallel: Remove unimplemented methods in ParCompactionManager
  • ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/43cf8b3d8067bc7128c98f86d5f8b6fa8bbed80e...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 21, 2023

@jddarcy Pushed as commit dfce4e1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jddarcy jddarcy deleted the JDK-8302800 branch October 26, 2024 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants