-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8302838: jabswitch main() should avoid calling exit explicitly #12650
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jwaters! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@TheShermanTanker The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@TheShermanTanker This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit cba817a.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TheShermanTanker Pushed as commit cba817a. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
In jabswitch, main is defined as
void main()
, which requires an explicit exit call whenever an error occurs, and extra error checking code on our part. Visual C++ will automatically convert all instances ofvoid main()
to return 0 in all cases anyway, and there isn't anything gained from using this custom signature when the same can be achieved by simply returning the error value normally, so I propose we simply change it to the regularint main
signatureProgress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12650/head:pull/12650
$ git checkout pull/12650
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12650
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12650/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12650
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12650
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12650.diff