-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8302907: [PPC64] Use more constexpr in class Register #12681
8302907: [PPC64] Use more constexpr in class Register #12681
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@TheRealMDoerr The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for the review! Pre-submit tests failure is unrelated (x86, but this PR only touches PPC64). |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 180b94c.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TheRealMDoerr Pushed as commit 180b94c. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
We should use
constexpr
more often in order to make it better usable. (I got compile errors when trying to use theencoding()
in anotherconstexpr
.)Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12681/head:pull/12681
$ git checkout pull/12681
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12681
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12681/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12681
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12681
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12681.diff