-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8303082 : [AIX] Missing C++ name demangling with XLClang++ #12742
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back deepa181! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Thanks for looking at this Deepa! This fixes an issue that I had always noticed, but never got around to digging in to :-) |
43eae94
to
4c65dda
Compare
Thank you @backwaterred . |
@deepa181 You have to fix whitespace errors before the integration system will allow this to be reviewed. Any tabs are not allowed, only spaces |
4c65dda
to
a81a688
Compare
@deepa181 Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
Thanks for review @TheShermanTanker . I removed extra whitespaces. |
Webrevs
|
4ed1f9d
to
49f0267
Compare
@deepa181 Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks @backwaterred . |
Hi @TheRealMDoerr , Could you please review this PR? Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for implementing it! Looks basically good to me. Please consider my suggestions.
@deepa181 Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
@deepa181 Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
@deepa181 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 478 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@backwaterred, @TheRealMDoerr, @tstuefe) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Thanks @TheRealMDoerr . |
Thanks @tstuefe for Suggesting and helping. |
/integrate |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit f9ed825.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TheRealMDoerr @deepa181 Pushed as commit f9ed825. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
It was failing as It was using the C++ demangling interface (Demangle) of the old demangler (that is, the C++ API as opposed to the C one). It is not supported by xlclang++ on AIX.
To demangle names generated by xlclang++ , use cxxabi.h __cxa_demangle interface ( see cxxabi.h).
This Solution applies to the following test
Reported Issue : JDK - 8303082
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/12742/head:pull/12742
$ git checkout pull/12742
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12742
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/12742/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12742
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12742
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12742.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment