8303917: Update ISO 639 language codes table

[justin-curtis-lu]

This PR modifies java.util.LocaleISOData.isoLanguageTable to include (name only) changes from up-to-date ISO 639 data.

In addition, this PR updates the ISO 639 data (generated in 1999) in Bug4175998Test.java. This includes modifying the generate_Tables() function, since the source data is now stored in a different format. The outdated raw data stored in the bottom of the file was removed.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8303917: Update ISO 639 language codes table

Reviewers

• Naoto Sato (@naotoj - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 5000c261

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12980/head:pull/12980
$ git checkout pull/12980

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12980
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12980/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12980

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12980

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12980.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (a43f9f4e)
• 00: Full (5000c261)

[naotoj]

Looks good.

[naotoj]

Could be simplified like

System.out.printf("""
    {"%s","%s","%s"},
""", iso639_1, iso639_2B, iso639_2T);

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8303917: Update ISO 639 language codes table

Reviewed-by: naoto

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 172 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• cd41c69: 8303705: Field sleeper.started should be volatile JdbLockTestTarg.java
• f5c8b68: 8301998: Update HarfBuzz to 7.0.1
• 617c15f: 8304172: ProblemList serviceability/sa/UniqueVtableTest.java
• f81e1de: 8303882: Refactor some iterators in jdk.compiler
• 45809fd: 8295884: Implement IDE support for Eclipse
• baf11e7: 8303814: getLastErrorString should avoid charset conversions
• 830fd41: 8302795: Shared archive failed on old version class with jsr bytecode
• 4e631fa: 8298966: Deprecate JMX Subject Delegation and the method JMXConnector.getMBeanServerConnection(Subject) for removal.
• 10f1674: 8303809: Dispose context in SPNEGO NegotiatorImpl
• 9f9ab02: 8303895: Simplify and clean up LinkFactory code
• ... and 162 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f3abc4063de658418283aee1f552c4b4976e5211...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@naotoj) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[justin-curtis-lu]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu
Your change (at version a43f9f4) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[naotoj]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit dd23ee9.
Since your change was applied there have been 280 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6f67abd: 8304557: java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture/CompletableFutureOrTimeoutExceptionallyTest.java times out
• 568dd57: 8304716: Clean up G1Policy::calc_max_old_cset_length()
• af0504e: 8304691: Remove jlink --post-process-path option
• 3859faf: 8231349: Move intrinsic stubs generation to compiler runtime initialization code
• f37674a: 8304711: Combine G1 root region abort and wait into a single method
• 7f9e691: 8304712: Only pass total number of regions into G1Policy::calc_min_old_cset_length
• 51035a7: 8294137: Review running times of java.math tests
• 46cca1a: 4842457: (bf spec) Clarify meaning of "(optional operation)"
• 6fa25cc: 8184444: The compiler error "variable not initialized in the default constructor" is not apt in case of static final variables
• 4b8f7db: 8027682: javac wrongly accepts semicolons in package and import decls
• ... and 270 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f3abc4063de658418283aee1f552c4b4976e5211...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@naotoj @justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit dd23ee9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.