8304242: CPUInfoTest fails because "serialize" CPU feature is not known

[kosta777]

This test fails on modern x86_64 hardware with "serialize" feature (eg. Intel Gen 12 and higher).
Support for this feature was added by JDK-8264543 but the test wasn't updated.

I have updated the test to recognize "serialize" as a supported CPU feature.
Tested on 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-13700K by running this new version of the test.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8304242: CPUInfoTest fails because "serialize" CPU feature is not known

Reviewers

• Vladimir Kozlov (@vnkozlov - Reviewer)
• Sandhya Viswanathan (@sviswa7 - Reviewer)
• Tobias Hartmann (@TobiHartmann - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/13062/head:pull/13062
$ git checkout pull/13062

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13062
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/13062/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13062

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13062

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13062.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kosta777! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kosta777 To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[kosta777]

/label add hotspot-compiler

[openjdk]

@kosta777
The hotspot-compiler label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (769ee1cf)

[vnkozlov]

Goos and trivial.

[openjdk]

@kosta777 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8304242: CPUInfoTest fails because "serialize" CPU feature is not known

Reviewed-by: kvn, sviswanathan, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6b42275: 7154070: in SwingSet2, switching between LaFs it's easy to lose JTable dividers
• 8eed7de: 8304146: Refactor VisibleMemberTable (LocalMemberTable)
• a487a27: 8303150: DCmd framework unnecessarily creates a DCmd instance on registration
• 2e987d7: 8304360: Test to ensure ConstantDescs fields work
• 2f23c80: 8304225: Remove javax/script/Test7.java from ProblemList

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@vnkozlov, @sviswa7, @TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[kosta777]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@kosta777
Your change (at version 769ee1c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[TobiHartmann]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 36995c5.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6b42275: 7154070: in SwingSet2, switching between LaFs it's easy to lose JTable dividers
• 8eed7de: 8304146: Refactor VisibleMemberTable (LocalMemberTable)
• a487a27: 8303150: DCmd framework unnecessarily creates a DCmd instance on registration
• 2e987d7: 8304360: Test to ensure ConstantDescs fields work
• 2f23c80: 8304225: Remove javax/script/Test7.java from ProblemList

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@TobiHartmann @kosta777 Pushed as commit 36995c5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.