Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8304671: javac regression: Compilation with --release 8 fails on underscore in enum identifiers #13137

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lahodaj
Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj commented Mar 22, 2023

_ is a valid name for --release 8, but code that estimates if a piece of code is an enum constant or a member will fail to recognize that. This patch enhances the estimator to include _ at the same level as identifiers.

For the estimator, it is not important if _ is permitted for the given source level or not - the upper levels will produce proper errors/warnings. So, the estimator will consider _ to be at the same level as an ordinary identifier.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8304671: javac regression: Compilation with --release 8 fails on underscore in enum identifiers

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13137/head:pull/13137
$ git checkout pull/13137

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13137
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13137/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13137

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13137

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13137.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 22, 2023

👋 Welcome back jlahoda! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 22, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 22, 2023

@lahodaj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 22, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 22, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks sensible

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 22, 2023

@lahodaj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8304671: javac regression: Compilation with --release 8 fails on underscore in enum identifiers

Reviewed-by: vromero, darcy

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 57 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a2d8f63: 8288730: Add type parameter to Lookup::accessClass and Lookup::ensureInitialized
  • 3777455: 8302191: Performance degradation for float/double modulo on Linux
  • 760c012: 8304683: Memory leak in WB_IsMethodCompatible
  • 75168ea: 8304134: jib bootstrapper fails to quote filename when checking download filetype
  • 4154a98: 8301498: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/x86
  • ddf1e34: 8304089: Convert TraceDependencies to UL
  • 358c61b: 8294972: Convert jdk.jlink internal plugins to use the Classfile API
  • c74507e: 8304657: G1: Rename set_state_empty to set_state_untracked
  • ca94287: 8304144: G1: Remove unnecessary is_survivor check in G1ClearCardTableTask
  • eda0065: 8304286: java/net/SocketOption/OptionsTest.java failing after JDK-8302659
  • ... and 47 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/620564ac6152be92c5fa83b474d30a43e698d51e...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 22, 2023
@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for tackling that so quickly.

@lahodaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahodaj commented Mar 23, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 23, 2023

Going to push as commit 63d4afb.
Since your change was applied there have been 62 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e2cfcfb: 6817009: Action.SELECTED_KEY not toggled when using key binding
  • af4d560: 8303951: Add asserts before record_method_not_compilable where possible
  • c433862: 6245410: javax.swing.text.html.CSS.Attribute: BACKGROUND_POSITION is not w3c spec compliant
  • 91f407d: 8029301: Confusing error message for array creation method reference
  • e73411a: 8304376: Rename t1/t2 classes in com/sun/jdi/CLETest.java to avoid class duplication error in IDE
  • a2d8f63: 8288730: Add type parameter to Lookup::accessClass and Lookup::ensureInitialized
  • 3777455: 8302191: Performance degradation for float/double modulo on Linux
  • 760c012: 8304683: Memory leak in WB_IsMethodCompatible
  • 75168ea: 8304134: jib bootstrapper fails to quote filename when checking download filetype
  • 4154a98: 8301498: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/x86
  • ... and 52 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/620564ac6152be92c5fa83b474d30a43e698d51e...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 23, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 23, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 23, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 23, 2023

@lahodaj Pushed as commit 63d4afb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants