Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8305343: BigDecimal.fractionOnly() erroneously returns true for large scale value #13326

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor

@rgiulietti rgiulietti commented Apr 4, 2023

A fix for the issue and additional specific tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8305343: BigDecimal.fractionOnly() erroneously returns true for large scale value

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13326/head:pull/13326
$ git checkout pull/13326

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13326
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13326/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13326

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13326

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13326.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 4, 2023

👋 Welcome back rgiulietti! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2023

@rgiulietti The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 4, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 4, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2023

@rgiulietti This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8305343: BigDecimal.fractionOnly() erroneously returns true for large scale value

Reviewed-by: darcy

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2ee4245: 8305509: C1 fails "assert(k != nullptr) failed: illegal use of unloaded klass"
  • 7baccd9: 8303260: (fc) FileChannel::transferFrom should support position > size()
  • 3ef834f: 8298619: java/io/File/GetXSpace.java is failing
  • c594119: 8305511: Remove ignore from com/sun/jdi/PopAndInvokeTest.java
  • 62bd2eb: 8303147: [s390x] fast & slow debug builds are broken
  • f9ed825: 8303082: [AIX] Missing C++ name demangling with XLClang++
  • 73a084c: 8305504: stutter typo in java.compiler files
  • 7b92210: 8305525: Problemlist runtime/ErrorHandling/TestDwarf on x86

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 4, 2023
@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2023

Going to push as commit 7c65048.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dd59471: 8304846: Provide a shared utility to dump generated classes defined via Lookup API
  • 2ee4245: 8305509: C1 fails "assert(k != nullptr) failed: illegal use of unloaded klass"
  • 7baccd9: 8303260: (fc) FileChannel::transferFrom should support position > size()
  • 3ef834f: 8298619: java/io/File/GetXSpace.java is failing
  • c594119: 8305511: Remove ignore from com/sun/jdi/PopAndInvokeTest.java
  • 62bd2eb: 8303147: [s390x] fast & slow debug builds are broken
  • f9ed825: 8303082: [AIX] Missing C++ name demangling with XLClang++
  • 73a084c: 8305504: stutter typo in java.compiler files
  • 7b92210: 8305525: Problemlist runtime/ErrorHandling/TestDwarf on x86

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2023

@rgiulietti Pushed as commit 7c65048.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@rgiulietti rgiulietti deleted the 8305343 branch April 5, 2023 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants