Skip to content

8305404: Compile_lock not needed for InstanceKlass::implementor() #13458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

coleenp
Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp commented Apr 13, 2023

See CR for details.
Tested with tier1-4, 7, 8.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8305404: Compile_lock not needed for InstanceKlass::implementor()

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13458/head:pull/13458
$ git checkout pull/13458

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13458
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13458/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13458

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13458

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13458.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 13, 2023

👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 13, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2023

@coleenp The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 13, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 13, 2023

Webrevs

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Apr 13, 2023

/assign @fisk

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2023

@coleenp Unknown command assign - for a list of valid commands use /help.

Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2023

@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8305404: Compile_lock not needed for InstanceKlass::implementor()

Reviewed-by: eosterlund, fparain

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d2ce04b: 8301496: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/riscv
  • 54bf370: 8170945: Collectors$Partition should override more Map methods
  • 0826cee: 8301495: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/ppc
  • c0c3122: 8305618: Move gcold out of tier1
  • 3651b92: 8305944: assert(is_aligned(ref, HeapWordSize)) failed: invariant
  • 12358e6: 8305934: PPC64: Disable VMContinuations on Big Endian
  • 287bb06: 8305902: (cs) Resolve default Charset only once in StreamEncoder and StreamDecoder
  • 8a1639d: 8305936: JavaThread::create_system_thread_object has unused is_visible argument
  • 76cda9f: 8255548: Missing coverage for javax.xml.crypto.dom.DOMCryptoContext
  • b60604e: 8305794: Unused interface sun.security.util.PermissionFactory can be removed
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/6b9b7d1d921367418f82c2813b272d3447a47595...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 13, 2023
@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Apr 13, 2023

Thanks Erik!

@coleenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

coleenp commented Apr 14, 2023

Thanks Fred!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 14, 2023

Going to push as commit ebeee6d.
Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d2ce04b: 8301496: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/riscv
  • 54bf370: 8170945: Collectors$Partition should override more Map methods
  • 0826cee: 8301495: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/ppc
  • c0c3122: 8305618: Move gcold out of tier1
  • 3651b92: 8305944: assert(is_aligned(ref, HeapWordSize)) failed: invariant
  • 12358e6: 8305934: PPC64: Disable VMContinuations on Big Endian
  • 287bb06: 8305902: (cs) Resolve default Charset only once in StreamEncoder and StreamDecoder
  • 8a1639d: 8305936: JavaThread::create_system_thread_object has unused is_visible argument
  • 76cda9f: 8255548: Missing coverage for javax.xml.crypto.dom.DOMCryptoContext
  • b60604e: 8305794: Unused interface sun.security.util.PermissionFactory can be removed
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/6b9b7d1d921367418f82c2813b272d3447a47595...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 14, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 14, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 14, 2023
@coleenp coleenp deleted the implementor branch April 14, 2023 15:33
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 14, 2023

@coleenp Pushed as commit ebeee6d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants