Skip to content

8306575: Clean up and open source four Dialog related tests #13592

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

azuev-java
Copy link
Member

@azuev-java azuev-java commented Apr 21, 2023

Cleaned up and stabilized four Dialog-related tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8306575: Clean up and open source four Dialog related tests

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13592/head:pull/13592
$ git checkout pull/13592

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13592
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13592/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13592

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13592

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13592.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Cleaned up and stabilized four Dialog-related tests.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 21, 2023

👋 Welcome back kizune! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 21, 2023

@azuev-java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 21, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 21, 2023

Webrevs

public class CL extends ComponentAdapter {
int lastX, lastY;
String message = "Failed in componentMoved() expect:[%d,%d]"
+ " reported: [%d,%d] diff [%d,%d]";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you leave a blank line to separate the method .

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

import java.util.List;

public class ModalDialogOnNonEdt {
public void start () {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you leave a blank line here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 21, 2023

@azuev-java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8306575: Clean up and open source four Dialog related tests

Reviewed-by: prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 72 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9ed456f: 8306634: Open source AWT Event related tests
  • b2240bf: 8304696: Duplicate class names in dynamicArchive tests can lead to test failure
  • cb158ff: 8296153: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 20
  • 117c5b1: 8279216: Investigate implementation of premultiplied alpha in the Little-CMS 2.13
  • 723037a: 8298048: Combine CDS archive heap into a single block
  • d518dbf: 8306440: Rename PSS:_num_optional_regions to _max_num_optional_regions
  • 9cd5741: 8306436: Rename PSS*:_n_workers to PSS*:_num_workers
  • 6e77e14: 8306456: Don't leak _worklist's memory in PhaseLive::compute
  • be6031b: 8303703: Add support of execution tests using virtual thread factory jtreg plugin
  • 5a00617: 8306543: GHA: MSVC installation is failing
  • ... and 62 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e3ece365ce7dc92dd9d0a7ad9eb53ed9ea87f48d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 21, 2023
@azuev-java
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2023

Going to push as commit 8d696ae.
Since your change was applied there have been 72 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9ed456f: 8306634: Open source AWT Event related tests
  • b2240bf: 8304696: Duplicate class names in dynamicArchive tests can lead to test failure
  • cb158ff: 8296153: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 20
  • 117c5b1: 8279216: Investigate implementation of premultiplied alpha in the Little-CMS 2.13
  • 723037a: 8298048: Combine CDS archive heap into a single block
  • d518dbf: 8306440: Rename PSS:_num_optional_regions to _max_num_optional_regions
  • 9cd5741: 8306436: Rename PSS*:_n_workers to PSS*:_num_workers
  • 6e77e14: 8306456: Don't leak _worklist's memory in PhaseLive::compute
  • be6031b: 8303703: Add support of execution tests using virtual thread factory jtreg plugin
  • 5a00617: 8306543: GHA: MSVC installation is failing
  • ... and 62 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e3ece365ce7dc92dd9d0a7ad9eb53ed9ea87f48d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 22, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 22, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 22, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 22, 2023

@azuev-java Pushed as commit 8d696ae.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

});
test.start();
} finally {
EventQueue.invokeLater(() -> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

invokeLater may not be executed before the test stops by the jtreg, EDT could be killed at that point. It is better to use invokeAndWait or somehow make sure it will ends.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

invokeLater may not be executed before the test stops by the jtreg, EDT could be killed at that point. It is better to use invokeAndWait or somehow make sure it will ends.

Totally agree.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants