8306765: Some client related jtreg problem list entries are malformed

[prrace]

There were missing platforms in a couple of problem list entries.
I verified the intended platforms are still needed and the other platforms pass.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8306765: Some client related jtreg problem list entries are malformed

Reviewers

• Iris Clark (@irisclark - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13626/head:pull/13626
$ git checkout pull/13626

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13626
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13626/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13626

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13626

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13626.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@prrace To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[prrace]

/label client

[openjdk]

@prrace
The client label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (908e234a)
• 00: Full (21d29768)

[openjdk]

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8306765: Some client related jtreg problem list entries are malformed

Reviewed-by: iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 25 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5f4965d: 8306687: Relax memory ordering constraints on metaspace atomic counters
• 33d6614: 8304845: Update PCSC-Lite for Suse Linux to 1.9.9 and fix incomplete license wording
• c92883a: 8306772: Remove sun.security.x509.CertException, sun.security.x509.CertParseError
• 0ff3a27: 8306008: Several Vector API tests fail for client VM after JDK-8304450
• e8f62de: 8304676: [vectorapi] x86_32: Crash in Assembler::kmovql(Address, KRegister)
• 98e8616: 8301169: java/net/httpclient/ThrowingSubscribersAsInputStream.java,ThrowingSubscribersAsInputStreamAsync.java, and other httpclient tests failing on windows: Unable to establish loopback connection
• 07ea445: 8306838: GetGraphicsTest needs to be headful
• 17ce097: 8266571: Sequenced Collections
• bad6aa6: 8289735: UTIL_LOOKUP_PROGS fails on pathes with space
• 5f50e99: 8306770: (fs) Remove obsolete os.version check from sun.nio.fs.BsdFileStore.supportsFileAttributeView
• ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/314db55f6dde033f62481b62f10dd11030473569...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[prrace]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 36d61c3.
Since your change was applied there have been 25 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5f4965d: 8306687: Relax memory ordering constraints on metaspace atomic counters
• 33d6614: 8304845: Update PCSC-Lite for Suse Linux to 1.9.9 and fix incomplete license wording
• c92883a: 8306772: Remove sun.security.x509.CertException, sun.security.x509.CertParseError
• 0ff3a27: 8306008: Several Vector API tests fail for client VM after JDK-8304450
• e8f62de: 8304676: [vectorapi] x86_32: Crash in Assembler::kmovql(Address, KRegister)
• 98e8616: 8301169: java/net/httpclient/ThrowingSubscribersAsInputStream.java,ThrowingSubscribersAsInputStreamAsync.java, and other httpclient tests failing on windows: Unable to establish loopback connection
• 07ea445: 8306838: GetGraphicsTest needs to be headful
• 17ce097: 8266571: Sequenced Collections
• bad6aa6: 8289735: UTIL_LOOKUP_PROGS fails on pathes with space
• 5f50e99: 8306770: (fs) Remove obsolete os.version check from sun.nio.fs.BsdFileStore.supportsFileAttributeView
• ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/314db55f6dde033f62481b62f10dd11030473569...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@prrace Pushed as commit 36d61c3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.