Skip to content

8307005: Make CardTableBarrierSet::initialize non-virtual #13713

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Apr 28, 2023

Trivial removing virtual specifier.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8307005: Make CardTableBarrierSet::initialize non-virtual

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13713/head:pull/13713
$ git checkout pull/13713

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13713
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13713/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13713

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13713

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13713.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 28, 2023

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8307005 8307005: Make CardTableBarrierSet::initialize non-virtual Apr 28, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 28, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 28, 2023

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 28, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 28, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine and trivial. Thanks.

Odd this went to the hotspot-dev list instead of hotspot-gc-dev.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 2, 2023

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8307005: Make CardTableBarrierSet::initialize non-virtual

Reviewed-by: dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 86f97fe: 8305919: java/lang/Thread/virtual/HoldsLock.java#id0 failed, ThreadInfo.getLockInfo() return null
  • 2179a8f: 8298087: XML Schema Validation reports an required attribute twice via ErrorHandler
  • 1227a27: 8306028: separate ThreadStart/ThreadEnd events posting code in JVMTI VTMS transitions
  • 35e75c1: 8301455: comments in TestTypeAnnotations still refer to resolved JDK-8068737
  • 561ec9c: 8300818: Reduce complexity of padding with DateTimeFormatter
  • ae5f678: 8282384: [LOOM] Need test for ThreadReference.interrupt() on a vthread
  • c7e1df8: 8304760: Add 2 Microsoft TLS roots
  • 6acf032: 8306678: Replace use of os.version with an internal Version record
  • f00a748: 8304915: Create jdk.internal.util.Architecture enum and apply
  • 7d07d19: 8305201: Improve error message for GroupLayouts that are too large on SysV
  • ... and 49 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1be80a4445cf74adc9b2cd5bf262a897f9ede74f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 2, 2023
@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2023

Going to push as commit 891530f.
Since your change was applied there have been 77 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e0774be: 8306997: C2: "malformed control flow" assert due to missing safepoint on backedge with a switch
  • 462b1df: 8307106: Allow concurrent GCs to walk CLDG without ClassLoaderDataGraph_lock
  • c8f3756: 8306729: Add nominal descriptors of modules and packages to Constants API
  • 0b5b642: 8307150: RISC-V: Remove remaining StoreLoad barrier with UseCondCardMark for Serial/Parallel GC
  • 418a825: 8306466: Open source more AWT Drag & Drop related tests
  • 74667e3: 8303919: Instant.ofEpochMilli says it can throw an exception that it can't
  • 76991c8: 8282232: [Win] GetMousePositionWithPopup test fails due to wrong mouse position
  • 05b9b58: 8302496: Runtime.exit incorrectly says it never throws an exception
  • 8a70664: 8293117: Add atomic bitset functions
  • 8c106b0: 8303784: no-@target annotations should be applicable to type parameter declarations
  • ... and 67 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1be80a4445cf74adc9b2cd5bf262a897f9ede74f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2023

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 891530f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the barrier-set-virtual branch May 3, 2023 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants