Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8307091: A few client tests intermittently throw ConcurrentModificationException #13783

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

TejeshR13
Copy link
Contributor

@TejeshR13 TejeshR13 commented May 3, 2023

Few test are throwing Concurrent Modification Exception Intermittently. Since the issue is intermittent and from the log and code review, It is found that the shared variable fileCache is used in comparison with the newFileCache where the comparison invokes the iterator method in AbstractList class. Since based on vector documentation it was evident that listIterator are fail-fast iterators and hence it would be better to make a separate local copy of vectors for comparing operations.
The same is implemented and tested in CI system which shows green.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8307091: A few client tests intermittently throw ConcurrentModificationException

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13783/head:pull/13783
$ git checkout pull/13783

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13783
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13783/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13783

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13783

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13783.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 3, 2023

👋 Welcome back tr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2023

@TejeshR13 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label May 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 3, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable. Fix the formatting I noted


if (start >= 0 && end > start) {
List<File> listEnd_OldSize = new Vector<>(fileCache.subList(end, oldSize));
if(listEnd_OldSize.equals(newFileCache.subList(start, newSize))) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if( -> "if ("

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated.

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

prrace commented May 3, 2023

PS update the PR summary to match the revised JBS one -
"A few client tests intermittently throw ConcurrentModificationException"

@DamonGuy
Copy link
Contributor

DamonGuy commented May 4, 2023

Looks like there's a title mismatch blocking you from integrating but changes LGTM.
EDIT: Just noticed Phil mentioned this already

@TejeshR13 TejeshR13 changed the title 8307091: Few test threw ConcurrentModificationException Intermittently 8307091: A few client tests intermittently throw ConcurrentModificationException May 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 4, 2023

@TejeshR13 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8307091: A few client tests intermittently throw ConcurrentModificationException

Reviewed-by: prr, dnguyen

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 674 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • caee1be: 8307305: Update debugger tests to support JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY mode
  • 3599448: 8307147: [x86] Dangling pointer warning for Assembler::_attributes
  • 64ac9a0: 8306946: jdk/test/lib/process/ProcessToolsStartProcessTest.java fails with "wrong number of lines in OutputAnalyzer output"
  • 03030d4: 8307134: Add GTS root CAs
  • 63cd0a3: 4200096: OffScreenImageSource.removeConsumer NullPointerException
  • db8b3cd: 8305963: Typo in java.security.Security.getProperty
  • dcb2f3f: 8306320: BufferedImage spec needs clarification w.r.t its implementation of the WritableRenderedImage interface
  • 1487477: 8305815: Update Libpng to 1.6.39
  • 705ad7d: 8306014: Update javax.net.ssl TLS tests to use SSLContextTemplate or SSLEngineTemplate
  • 3930709: 8068925: Add @OverRide in javax.tools classes
  • ... and 664 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/431e702b676e2c02224d60181c34b5fe97873d8b...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 4, 2023
@TejeshR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 4, 2023

Going to push as commit 465bdd9.
Since your change was applied there have been 674 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • caee1be: 8307305: Update debugger tests to support JTREG_TEST_THREAD_FACTORY mode
  • 3599448: 8307147: [x86] Dangling pointer warning for Assembler::_attributes
  • 64ac9a0: 8306946: jdk/test/lib/process/ProcessToolsStartProcessTest.java fails with "wrong number of lines in OutputAnalyzer output"
  • 03030d4: 8307134: Add GTS root CAs
  • 63cd0a3: 4200096: OffScreenImageSource.removeConsumer NullPointerException
  • db8b3cd: 8305963: Typo in java.security.Security.getProperty
  • dcb2f3f: 8306320: BufferedImage spec needs clarification w.r.t its implementation of the WritableRenderedImage interface
  • 1487477: 8305815: Update Libpng to 1.6.39
  • 705ad7d: 8306014: Update javax.net.ssl TLS tests to use SSLContextTemplate or SSLEngineTemplate
  • 3930709: 8068925: Add @OverRide in javax.tools classes
  • ... and 664 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/431e702b676e2c02224d60181c34b5fe97873d8b...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 4, 2023

@TejeshR13 Pushed as commit 465bdd9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

return null;

if (start >= 0 && end > start) {
List<File> listStart_OldSize = new Vector<>(fileCache.subList(start, oldSize));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why Vector was used instead of ArrayList ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing specific reason why I choose vector apart from the main object is of Vector type and since in this context (where both the objects are not shared) both Vector/Arraylist comparison remains same. Does Arraylist comparison has any advantage here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I already looked at this and Vector is what this class uses already and there's no reason to be different and definitely no reason to change the rest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants