8307573: Implementation of JEP 449: Deprecate the Windows 32-bit x86 Port for Removal

[gdams]

Deprecate the Windows x86-32 port, with the intent to remove it in a future release.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8307573: Implementation of JEP 449: Deprecate the Windows 32-bit x86 Port for Removal

Reviewers

• Erik Joelsson (@erikj79 - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 8c090a71

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13852/head:pull/13852
$ git checkout pull/13852

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13852
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13852/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13852

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13852

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13852.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back gdams! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@gdams The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 04: Full - Incremental (29c960a3)
• 03: Full - Incremental (a79fa92e)
• 02: Full - Incremental (8c090a71)
• 01: Full - Incremental (20315f6f)
• 00: Full (671fe9fe)

[openjdk]

@gdams Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

[openjdk]

@gdams This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8307573: Implementation of JEP 449: Deprecate the Windows 32-bit x86 Port for Removal

Reviewed-by: erikj

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 4f88437: 8307908: [ppc] Add failing RTM tests to ProblemList until 8307907 is fixed.
• dc30e68: 8308407: libjvm library not reproducibly comparable between vendors
• 18e2446: 8301381: Verify DTLS 1.0 cannot be negotiated
• b3cb82b: 8307311: Timeouts on one macOS 12.6.1 host of two Swing JTableHeader tests
• 3d550f7: 8280993: [XWayland] Popup is not closed on click outside of area controlled by XWayland
• 05e99db: 7065228: To interpret case-insensitive string locale independently
• a970519: 8306983: Do not invoke external programs when switch terminal to raw mode on selected platforms
• 6b65e57: 8305785: Avoid redundant HashMap.containsKey call in java.util.regex
• 8011ba7: 8308181: Generational ZGC: Remove CLDG_lock from old gen root scanning
• 8aa5028: 8302344: Compiler Implementation for Unnamed patterns and variables (Preview)

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@erikj79) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[gdams]

This JEP has now been moved from "Proposed to target" to "Targeted" which means I think we can merge this now.

[dholmes-ora]

@gdams please see my comment above re the wording. Thanks

[gdams]

@gdams please see my comment above re the wording. Thanks

@dholmes-ora updated PTAL

[gdams]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@gdams
Your change (at version 29c960a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[JesperIRL]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 29b8d3d.
Since your change was applied there have been 12 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5fc9b57: 8308276: Change layout API to work with bytes, not bits
• 91aeb5d: 8287834: Add SymbolLookup::or method
• 4f88437: 8307908: [ppc] Add failing RTM tests to ProblemList until 8307907 is fixed.
• dc30e68: 8308407: libjvm library not reproducibly comparable between vendors
• 18e2446: 8301381: Verify DTLS 1.0 cannot be negotiated
• b3cb82b: 8307311: Timeouts on one macOS 12.6.1 host of two Swing JTableHeader tests
• 3d550f7: 8280993: [XWayland] Popup is not closed on click outside of area controlled by XWayland
• 05e99db: 7065228: To interpret case-insensitive string locale independently
• a970519: 8306983: Do not invoke external programs when switch terminal to raw mode on selected platforms
• 6b65e57: 8305785: Avoid redundant HashMap.containsKey call in java.util.regex
• ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b58879790083b704da94ea1476fcadb0e65b0805...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@JesperIRL @gdams Pushed as commit 29b8d3d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[dholmes-ora]

Thanks for the update