Skip to content

8304685: Fix whitespace parsing in libjdwp #13964

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls commented May 12, 2023

Problem call to skipWhitespace in dbgsysExec src/jdk.jdwp.agent/unix/native/libjdwp/exec_md.c:91

We call skipWhitespace even when the loop will terminate, should guard against the last skipWhitespace call on the last iteration.

Could be done differently with the skipWhitespace call at the start of the loop, but skipped on the first iteration, but leaving the statements in the loop in the same order seems more readable.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13964/head:pull/13964
$ git checkout pull/13964

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13964
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13964/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13964

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13964

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13964.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 12, 2023

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 12, 2023

@kevinjwalls The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label May 12, 2023
@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2023 18:47
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 12, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 12, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
Thanks,
Serguei

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls changed the title 8304685: heap-buffer-overflow in libjdwp 8304685: Fix whitespace parsing in libjdwp May 13, 2023
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the reviews!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 19, 2023

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8304685: Fix whitespace parsing in libjdwp

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, amenkov, sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 101 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 241455f: 8307962: Exclude gc/g1/TestSkipRebuildRemsetPhase.java fails with virtual test thread factory
  • 34468e1: 8308021: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2023-05-11
  • f0aebc8: 8305972: Update XML Security for Java to 3.0.2
  • 265f40b: 8308396: Fix offset_of conversion warnings in runtime code
  • a5343fa: 8281149: (fs) java/nio/file/FileStore/Basic.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: values differ by more than 1GB
  • 44218b1: 8308248: Revisit alignment of layout constants on 32-bit platforms
  • 80ef5c2: 8308410: broken compilation of test\jdk\tools\launcher\exeJliLaunchTest.c
  • 326d778: 8306057: False arguments calling dispatch_base for aarch64
  • 690d396: 8308408: Build failure with -Werror=maybe-uninitialized in libjli/java.c with GCC8
  • fa14314: 8303669: SelectVersion indexes past the end of the argv array
  • ... and 91 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/6ebea8973feb08a7443d8d86ff52f453dc4aec43...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 19, 2023
@kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 19, 2023

Going to push as commit 939344b.
Since your change was applied there have been 101 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 241455f: 8307962: Exclude gc/g1/TestSkipRebuildRemsetPhase.java fails with virtual test thread factory
  • 34468e1: 8308021: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2023-05-11
  • f0aebc8: 8305972: Update XML Security for Java to 3.0.2
  • 265f40b: 8308396: Fix offset_of conversion warnings in runtime code
  • a5343fa: 8281149: (fs) java/nio/file/FileStore/Basic.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: values differ by more than 1GB
  • 44218b1: 8308248: Revisit alignment of layout constants on 32-bit platforms
  • 80ef5c2: 8308410: broken compilation of test\jdk\tools\launcher\exeJliLaunchTest.c
  • 326d778: 8306057: False arguments calling dispatch_base for aarch64
  • 690d396: 8308408: Build failure with -Werror=maybe-uninitialized in libjli/java.c with GCC8
  • fa14314: 8303669: SelectVersion indexes past the end of the argv array
  • ... and 91 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/6ebea8973feb08a7443d8d86ff52f453dc4aec43...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 19, 2023

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 939344b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants