Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8308043: Deadlock in TestCSLocker.java due to blocking GC while allocating #13989

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

fisk
Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk commented May 15, 2023

The TestCSLocker.java test spawns a thread that grabs the GC locker, and then wait for the first thread to run some java code and then get signal back to release the GC locker. All of this while another thread is allocating garbage and triggering GCs. Naturally, if the thread that is to signal the release of the GC locker requires GC in order to make progress, we will end up with a deadlock that leads to a timeout. As it turns out, that does indeed happen. A println statement is performed, which in its internal implementation performs an allocation, which requires GC. I think any GC can spuriously fail here, but it seems more likely with generational ZGC for whatever reason. While it seems really shady to wait with the GC locker held while a Java thread executing Java code is supposed to make progress, in general, I think the test can be fixed by removing the println statement causing the allocation. I have run the test 200 times, and it's no longer failing with generational ZGC.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8308043: Deadlock in TestCSLocker.java due to blocking GC while allocating

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13989/head:pull/13989
$ git checkout pull/13989

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13989
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13989/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13989

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13989

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13989.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 15, 2023

👋 Welcome back eosterlund! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 15, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 15, 2023

@fisk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label May 15, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 15, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 15, 2023

@fisk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8308043: Deadlock in TestCSLocker.java due to blocking GC while allocating

Reviewed-by: stefank, ayang, tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8686a36: 8307315: Missing ResourceMark in CDS and JVMTI code
  • 23cbb2d: 8306860: Avoid unnecessary allocation in List.map() when list is empty
  • be54b54: 8307369: Add execution of all svc tests in CI
  • 19c8c30: 8305634: Renaming predicates, simple cleanups, and adding summary about current predicates
  • 72294c5: 8308024: HttpClient (HTTP/1.1) sends an extraneous empty chunk if the BodyPublisher supplies an empty buffer
  • c9b6bb5: 8308041: [JVMCI] WB_IsGCSupportedByJVMCICompiler must enter correct JVMCI env
  • 0790f70: 8306806: JMX agent with JDP enabled won't start when PerfData is disabled
  • c2ef302: 8307968: serviceability/jvmti/vthread/StopThreadTest/StopThreadTest.java timed out
  • d22bcc8: 8307403: java/util/zip/DeInflate.java timed out
  • 2210e06: 8306638: Open source some AWT tests related to datatransfer and Toolkit
  • ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8d49ba9e8d3095f850b3007b56488a0c0cf8ddff...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 15, 2023
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {

// check timeout to success deadlocking
while(System.currentTimeMillis() < startTime + timeout) {
System.out.println("sleeping...");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think some comments (one cannot run any gc-triggering code, e.g. println) here would be nice. It's super tempting to add some innocent debug-prints before suspending the current thread, while extending/fixing this test case in the future.

@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {

// check timeout to success deadlocking
while(System.currentTimeMillis() < startTime + timeout) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In addition to @albertnetymk's comment, please also fix the whitespace after the while and the bracket.

@fisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

fisk commented May 16, 2023

Thanks for the reviews @stefank @tschatzl and @albertnetymk! I updated with a comment and whitespace fix as suggested, and removed an old problem listing for this test.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 16, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 16, 2023
@fisk
Copy link
Contributor Author

fisk commented May 17, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2023

Going to push as commit 285c833.
Since your change was applied there have been 40 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 17, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 17, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 17, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2023

@fisk Pushed as commit 285c833.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants