-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8307315: Missing ResourceMark in CDS and JVMTI code #13992
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8307315: Missing ResourceMark in CDS and JVMTI code #13992
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ccheung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@calvinccheung The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
@calvinccheung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 29 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Just a nit about the comment.
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ InstanceKlass* KlassFactory::check_shared_class_file_load_hook( | |||
assert(ik != nullptr, "sanity"); | |||
assert(ik->is_shared(), "expecting a shared class"); | |||
if (JvmtiExport::should_post_class_file_load_hook()) { | |||
// Caller needs a ResourceMark because parts of the returned cfs are resource-allocated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this comment should be placed in filemap.hpp above the declaration of FileMapInfo::open_stream_for_jvmti()
. We use the same convention for other functions that needs the caller to create the ResourceMark.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
Going to push as commit 8686a36.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@calvinccheung Pushed as commit 8686a36. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Please review this simple fix for adding a missing
ResourceMark
inKlassFactory::check_shared_class_file_load_hook
which is a common caller ofFileMapInfo::open_stream_for_jvmti
andJvmtiClassFileLoadHookPoster::post_to_env
(indirectly viaJvmtiExport::post_class_file_load_hook
).Passed tiers 1 - 3 testing.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13992/head:pull/13992
$ git checkout pull/13992
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13992
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13992/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13992
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13992
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13992.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment