Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8255542: Attribute length of Module, ModulePackages and other attributes is ignored #1407

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman commented Nov 24, 2020

The attribute_length of known ModuleXXXX attributes in the module-info.class is currently ignored. It should be checked and the class rejected if the attribute length doesn't exactly match the length of the info in the attribute.

There are several ways to fix this. I initially limited the reading of the attribute_info to the attribute length but this resulted in confusing exception messages as the attribute appears truncated. The exception messages are clearer when it checks that the attribute length corresponds to the number of bytes read.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8255542: Attribute length of Module, ModulePackages and other attributes is ignored

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1407/head:pull/1407
$ git checkout pull/1407

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 24, 2020

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 24, 2020

@AlanBateman The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 24, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 24, 2020

@AlanBateman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8255542: Attribute length of Module, ModulePackages and other attributes is ignored

Reviewed-by: mchung, dfuchs, chegar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6c9482e: 8257561: Some code is not vectorized after 8251925 and 8250607
  • 70517c8: 8257642: CipherByteBufferOverwriteTest copyright issue
  • e836396: 8257436: [aarch64] Regressions in ArrayCopyUnalignedDst.testByte/testChar for 65-78 bytes when UseSIMDForMemoryOps is on
  • b170c83: 8257591: Remove suppression of record preview related warnings in java.lang
  • 66a2e70: 8255845: Memory leak in imageFile.cpp
  • fa58671: 8257020: [JVMCI] enable a JVMCICompiler to specify which GCs it supports
  • 129c377: 8257594: C2 compiled checkcast of non-null object triggers endless deoptimization/recompilation cycle
  • e4497c9: 8256718: Obsolete the long term deprecated and aliased Trace flags
  • 4a267f1: 8244847: Linux/PPC: runtime/CompressedOops/CompressedClassPointers: smallHeapTest fails
  • b44a329: 8256864: [windows] Improve tracing for mapping errors

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 24, 2020
@AlanBateman AlanBateman marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2020 18:28
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 2, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 2, 2020

Webrevs


long newPosition = in.count();
if (newPosition != (initialPosition + length)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be:

if ((newPosition - intialPosition) != length) {

just to make it clear that no overflow can happen?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The attribute_length is a u4 so shouldn't arise but you are probably right that it would be clearer to reorganize it as you suggest.


@Override
public String readUTF() throws IOException {
return DataInputStream.readUTF(this);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If i understand correctly the code, I believe readUTF should change a boolean field named countCanNotBeTrackedAnymore from false to true, and in the method count(), countCanNotBeTrackedAnymore has to be checked and throws an ISE before returning count

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Rémi, I do not think that that is required. DataInputStream.readUTF will call back into this to do the reading so the count should be properly incremented? Or maybe I'm missing something. Best regards!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks,
i should have read the code more carefully.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The module-info is read sequentially so the constant pool is read (and indexed) before the attributes are read. So any references to UTF-8 constants doesn't involve random access. But maybe you mean something else?

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 4, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 4, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2020

@AlanBateman Since your change was applied there have been 30 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ca40267: 8257509: Strengthen requirements to call G1HeapVerifier::verify(VerifyOption)
  • 4a85514: 8257182: JCK test failures in integer / long rotation tests
  • f33808f: 8257631: C2: Assertion failure in ArrayCopyNode::get_count() during late inlining
  • 417e7e6: 8257632: C2: Late inlining attempt on a call with a dead memory crashes
  • 6845fee: 8257625: C2: Harden input checks in vector intrinsics
  • 4390f2c: 8257630: C2: ReplacedNodes doesn't handle non-CFG multi nodes
  • d08c612: 8257708: Remove redundant unmodifiableSet wrapper from already immutable set returned by Collections.singleton
  • 49f9e57: 8257734: Extraneous output in HmacSHA3_512 constructor
  • f83fd4a: 8257438: Avoid adding duplicate values into extendedKeyCodesSet
  • 37c7835: 8257673: Build fails without shenandoahgc after JDK-8257563
  • ... and 20 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/ae1eb286c6a2e76c3b38d68641208d4c01d4eef8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 2b4a423.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
5 participants