Skip to content

8309498: [JVMCI] race in CallSiteTargetValue recording #14315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor

@tkrodriguez tkrodriguez commented Jun 5, 2023

intermittent failures with Graal on ContinuousCallSiteTargetChange showed that when constructing the CallSiteTargetValue Assumption we read the value twice so the dependency and the value in the program might be different leading to incorrect execution.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8309498: [JVMCI] race in CallSiteTargetValue recording (Bug - "3")

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14315/head:pull/14315
$ git checkout pull/14315

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14315
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14315/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14315

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14315

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14315.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 5, 2023

👋 Welcome back never! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 5, 2023

@tkrodriguez The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • graal
  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 5, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 7, 2023

@tkrodriguez This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8309498: [JVMCI] race in CallSiteTargetValue recording

Reviewed-by: dnsimon, kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 64 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 33bb64f: 8309614: [BACKOUT] JDK-8307153 JVMTI GetThreadState on carrier should return STATE_WAITING
  • 5b147eb: 8308288: Fix xlc17 clang warnings and build errors in hotspot
  • 89f5bac: 8309225: Fix xlc17 clang 15 warnings in security and servicability
  • 6eddbe2: 8309219: Fix xlc17 clang 15 warnings in java.base
  • 177e832: 8307153: JVMTI GetThreadState on carrier should return STATE_WAITING
  • f0236ed: 8309543: Micro-optimize x86 assembler UseCondCardMark
  • 9d7bf53: 8280982: [Wayland] [XWayland] java.awt.Robot taking screenshots
  • a1ab377: 8309550: jdk.jfr.internal.Utils::formatDataAmount method should gracefully handle amounts equal to Long.MIN_VALUE
  • c49129f: 8308445: Linker should check that capture state segment is big enough
  • fa79111: 8308031: Linkers should reject unpromoted variadic parameters
  • ... and 54 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3fa776d66a8eb117410025bca870b2e7f3f00517...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 7, 2023
@tkrodriguez
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 8, 2023

Going to push as commit bb96682.
Since your change was applied there have been 85 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 8, 2023

@tkrodriguez Pushed as commit bb96682.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants