Skip to content

Conversation

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member

@jddarcy jddarcy commented Jun 5, 2023

Improve testing methodology for unnamed classes in javax.lang.model, including coverage of binary names.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8309503: Improve javax.lang.model tests for JEP 445 (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14321/head:pull/14321
$ git checkout pull/14321

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14321
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14321/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14321

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14321

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14321.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 5, 2023

👋 Welcome back darcy! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 5, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 5, 2023

@jddarcy The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 5, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 6, 2023

@jddarcy This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8309503: Improve javax.lang.model tests for JEP 445

Reviewed-by: jlahoda, jjg, jlaskey

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 6, 2023
@jddarcy
Copy link
Member Author

jddarcy commented Jun 7, 2023

Note using the enablePreview jtreg in the test rather than the explicit option to the compile commands didn't work; I didn't try to investigate in detail.

Note I'll revert the changes in ClassReader.java before pushing; they were borrowed from #14344 to get the test working with a corrected javac.

Copy link
Member

@JimLaskey JimLaskey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - ran test

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member Author

jddarcy commented Jun 7, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 7, 2023

Going to push as commit c24b0ba.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • a54f4d4: 8309509: com/sun/jdi/RedefineNestmateAttr/TestNestmateAttr.java fails with virtual test thread factory

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 7, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 7, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 7, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 7, 2023

@jddarcy Pushed as commit c24b0ba.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jddarcy jddarcy deleted the JDK-8309503 branch June 10, 2023 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants