Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8309883: no @since info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java, Main.java #14431

Conversation

jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons commented Jun 12, 2023

Please review a trivial update to add some long-overdue @since tags to public API in com.sun.tools.javac.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8309883: no @since info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java, Main.java (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14431/head:pull/14431
$ git checkout pull/14431

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14431
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14431/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14431

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14431

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14431.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 12, 2023

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 12, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 12, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 12, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@irisclark irisclark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow. Surprised to see that one escape for so long!

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons changed the title JDK-8309883: no @since info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java,Main.java JDK-8309883: no '@since' info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java,Main.java Jun 21, 2023
@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow. Surprised to see that one escape for so long!

Nothing like this surprises me any more!

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons changed the title JDK-8309883: no '@since' info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java,Main.java JDK-8309883: no @since info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java,Main.java Jun 21, 2023
@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons changed the title JDK-8309883: no @since info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java,Main.java JDK-8309883: no @since info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java, Main.java Jun 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 21, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8309883: no `@since` info in com.sun.tools.javac package-info.java, Main.java

Reviewed-by: iris, darcy

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 123 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 72501cf: 8310379: Relax prerequisites for java.base-jmod target
  • 59c6c0e: 8310335: JFR: Modernize collections and switch statements
  • 826dcb5: 8264899: C1: -XX:AbortVMOnException does not work if all methods in the call stack are compiled with C1 and there are no exception handlers
  • 658c337: 8309296: jdk/jfr/event/runtime/TestAgentEvent.java fails due to "missing" dynamic JavaAgent
  • 70e1c92: 8310297: assert(static_cast(result) == thing) with ctw
  • 574c6f0: 8310376: Extend SetupTarget macro with DIR parameter
  • 7ea22cd: 8310369: UTIL_ARG_WITH fails when arg is disabled
  • 01623f6: 8310133: Effectivelly final condition not enforced in guards for binding variables from the same case
  • a15db1a: 8302865: Illegal bytecode for break from if with instanceof pattern matching condition
  • 67fbd87: 8310143: RandomCommandsTest fails due to unexpected VM exit code after JDK-8282797
  • ... and 113 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3028295fdd2e5caf22463d1ee8009e72d4221d53...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 21, 2023
@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 21, 2023

Going to push as commit 226c6a0.
Since your change was applied there have been 124 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • fd1163d: 8310332: Fix -Wconversion warnings in MethodData
  • 72501cf: 8310379: Relax prerequisites for java.base-jmod target
  • 59c6c0e: 8310335: JFR: Modernize collections and switch statements
  • 826dcb5: 8264899: C1: -XX:AbortVMOnException does not work if all methods in the call stack are compiled with C1 and there are no exception handlers
  • 658c337: 8309296: jdk/jfr/event/runtime/TestAgentEvent.java fails due to "missing" dynamic JavaAgent
  • 70e1c92: 8310297: assert(static_cast(result) == thing) with ctw
  • 574c6f0: 8310376: Extend SetupTarget macro with DIR parameter
  • 7ea22cd: 8310369: UTIL_ARG_WITH fails when arg is disabled
  • 01623f6: 8310133: Effectivelly final condition not enforced in guards for binding variables from the same case
  • a15db1a: 8302865: Illegal bytecode for break from if with instanceof pattern matching condition
  • ... and 114 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3028295fdd2e5caf22463d1ee8009e72d4221d53...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 21, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons Pushed as commit 226c6a0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons deleted the 8309883.since-com.sun.tools.javac branch June 21, 2023 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants