8309907: Remove unused _print_gc_overhead_limit_would_be_exceeded

[albertnetymk]

Trivial removing dead code.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8309907: Remove unused _print_gc_overhead_limit_would_be_exceeded (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Thomas Schatzl (@tschatzl - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14442/head:pull/14442
$ git checkout pull/14442

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14442
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14442/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14442

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14442

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14442.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (3fbb69e1)

[tschatzl]

lgtm and trivial

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8309907: Remove unused _print_gc_overhead_limit_would_be_exceeded

Reviewed-by: tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• 4f23fc1: 8309671: Avoid using jvmci.Compiler property to determine if Graal is enabled

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[albertnetymk]

Thanks for the review.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 63843b1.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6d05360: 8304403: Remove unused methods in RangeCheckElimination::Bound
• 9b0baa1: 8306281: function isWsl() returns false on WSL2
• c884862: 8309468: Remove jvmti Allocate locker test case
• 05f896a: 8309862: Unsafe list operations in JfrStringPool
• 4f23fc1: 8309671: Avoid using jvmci.Compiler property to determine if Graal is enabled

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 63843b1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.