-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8308499: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodExitRequest/addClassExclusionFilter/filter001/TestDescription.java failed: VMDisconnectedException #14480
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ public static int run (String argv[], PrintStream out) { | |||
|
|||
private String classExclName1 = "java"; | |||
private String classExclName2 = "sun"; | |||
private String classExclName3 = "jdk"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fix is reasonable. However,
I think it would be better to use List with List.of(...) and list.contains() to filter exclusions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With 3 items it's borderline which approach to do. I find it easier to read the way it is now, especially checking the event classname, since it would require a loop that sets a flag that then has to be checked outside of the loop.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you think it is easier, then fine.
@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for the reviews Leonid and Kevin! /integrate |
Going to push as commit 79ff72a.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@plummercj Pushed as commit 79ff72a. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
The test gets overloaded with MethodExitEvents, causing them to queue up (in the JDI queue) and continue to be processed by the test after the debuggee exits. This results in a VMDisconnectedException when the test tries to do the following after getting an event:
String str = ((MethodExitEvent)event).location().declaringType().name();
The test is suppose to add filters to execlude events for all non-test classes, but it is only filtering
java.*
andsun.*
. There are also a very large number ofjdk.*
events coming in, and this is what is causing the event backlog and the processing of events after disconnect. Filtering outjdk.*
events reduces the total number of events to a few dozen, and the test passes.More details can be found in the CR.
Testing in progress: tier5 svc testing, and also running the failing test on all platforms (both debug and product).
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14480/head:pull/14480
$ git checkout pull/14480
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14480
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14480/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14480
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14480
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14480.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment