Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8308499: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodExitRequest/addClassExclusionFilter/filter001/TestDescription.java failed: VMDisconnectedException #14480

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

plummercj
Copy link
Contributor

@plummercj plummercj commented Jun 14, 2023

The test gets overloaded with MethodExitEvents, causing them to queue up (in the JDI queue) and continue to be processed by the test after the debuggee exits. This results in a VMDisconnectedException when the test tries to do the following after getting an event:

String str = ((MethodExitEvent)event).location().declaringType().name();

The test is suppose to add filters to execlude events for all non-test classes, but it is only filtering java.* and sun.*. There are also a very large number of jdk.* events coming in, and this is what is causing the event backlog and the processing of events after disconnect. Filtering out jdk.* events reduces the total number of events to a few dozen, and the test passes.

More details can be found in the CR.

Testing in progress: tier5 svc testing, and also running the failing test on all platforms (both debug and product).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8308499: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodExitRequest/addClassExclusionFilter/filter001/TestDescription.java failed: VMDisconnectedException (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14480/head:pull/14480
$ git checkout pull/14480

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14480
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14480/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14480

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14480

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14480.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 14, 2023

👋 Welcome back cjplummer! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8308499 8308499: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodExitRequest/addClassExclusionFilter/filter001/TestDescription.java failed: VMDisconnectedException Jun 14, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 14, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 14, 2023

@plummercj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 14, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Webrevs

@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ public static int run (String argv[], PrintStream out) {

private String classExclName1 = "java";
private String classExclName2 = "sun";
private String classExclName3 = "jdk";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix is reasonable. However,
I think it would be better to use List with List.of(...) and list.contains() to filter exclusions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With 3 items it's borderline which approach to do. I find it easier to read the way it is now, especially checking the event classname, since it would require a loop that sets a flag that then has to be checked outside of the loop.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you think it is easier, then fine.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 15, 2023

@plummercj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8308499: Test vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodExitRequest/addClassExclusionFilter/filter001/TestDescription.java failed: VMDisconnectedException

Reviewed-by: lmesnik, kevinw

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3e0bbd2: 8285368: Overhaul doc-comment inheritance
  • 3eeb681: 8167252: Some of Charset.availableCharsets() does not contain itself
  • 653a8d0: 8310129: SetupNativeCompilation LIBS should match the order of the other parameters
  • 947f149: 8308444: LoadStoreNode::result_not_used() is too conservative
  • 8b4af46: 8309974: some JVMCI tests fail when VM options include -XX:+EnableJVMCI
  • 0038491: 8309978: [x64] Fix useless padding
  • 5f3613e: 8309960: ParallelGC young collections very slow in DelayInducer
  • 83d9267: 8303513: C2: LoadKlassNode::make fails with 'expecting TypeKlassPtr'
  • de8aca2: 8307907: [ppc] Remove RTM locking implementation
  • 4c0e164: 8309717: C2: Remove Arena::move_contents usage
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/931625a9304ec2761ca9035d69fd33f6beadb124...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 15, 2023
@plummercj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the reviews Leonid and Kevin!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 15, 2023

Going to push as commit 79ff72a.
Since your change was applied there have been 12 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3e0bbd2: 8285368: Overhaul doc-comment inheritance
  • 3eeb681: 8167252: Some of Charset.availableCharsets() does not contain itself
  • 653a8d0: 8310129: SetupNativeCompilation LIBS should match the order of the other parameters
  • 947f149: 8308444: LoadStoreNode::result_not_used() is too conservative
  • 8b4af46: 8309974: some JVMCI tests fail when VM options include -XX:+EnableJVMCI
  • 0038491: 8309978: [x64] Fix useless padding
  • 5f3613e: 8309960: ParallelGC young collections very slow in DelayInducer
  • 83d9267: 8303513: C2: LoadKlassNode::make fails with 'expecting TypeKlassPtr'
  • de8aca2: 8307907: [ppc] Remove RTM locking implementation
  • 4c0e164: 8309717: C2: Remove Arena::move_contents usage
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/931625a9304ec2761ca9035d69fd33f6beadb124...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 15, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 15, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 15, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 15, 2023

@plummercj Pushed as commit 79ff72a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants