Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8310314: Misplaced "unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default" error #14544

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

lahodaj
Copy link
Contributor

@lahodaj lahodaj commented Jun 19, 2023

Consider code like:

$ cat Test.java
void main() {
    System.err.println("Hello!");
}

Currently, the "unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default" error is put at the end of the file:

$ java Test.java
Test.java:4: error: unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default.

  (use --enable-preview to enable unnamed classes)
1 error
error: compilation failed

This does not seem to be user friendly. It seems to me that putting the error on the first method/variable in the file would be better:

$ java Test.java
Test.java:1: error: unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default.
void main() {
^
  (use --enable-preview to enable unnamed classes)
1 error
error: compilation failed

The proposed patch is to simply move the source level check to the place where the top-level method or field is parsed. Calling the method multiple times for a single file should not be a problem - Log itself will prevent printing the error multiple times for the same file.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8310314: Misplaced "unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default" error (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14544/head:pull/14544
$ git checkout pull/14544

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14544
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14544/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14544

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14544

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14544.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 19, 2023

👋 Welcome back jlahoda! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@lahodaj The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 19, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@JimLaskey JimLaskey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lahodaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahodaj commented Jun 19, 2023

/backport jdk21

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@lahodaj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310314: Misplaced "unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default" error

Reviewed-by: jlaskey

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@lahodaj Backport for repo openjdk/jdk21 on branch master was successfully enabled and will be performed once this pull request has been integrated. Further instructions will be provided at that time.

@lahodaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahodaj commented Jun 20, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 20, 2023

Going to push as commit 79069c5.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 96a7db7: 8309228: Clarify EXPERIMENTAL flags comment in hotspot/share/runtime/globals.hpp
  • b2e86ae: 8304478: Initial nroff manpage generation for JDK 22
  • 7b45c8f: 8241800: Disable IPV6_MULTICAST_ALL to prevent interference from all multicast groups
  • 137a5f7: 8310105: LoongArch64 builds are broken after JDK-8304913
  • 33c6ec9: 8310019: MIPS builds are broken after JDK-8304913
  • e08e94f: 8310266: JFR: Refactor after 'view' command

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 20, 2023

Creating backport for repo openjdk/jdk21 on branch master

/backport openjdk/jdk21 master

@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed backport=openjdk/jdk21:master labels Jun 20, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 20, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 20, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 20, 2023

@lahodaj Pushed as commit 79069c5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 20, 2023

@openjdk[bot] @lahodaj the backport was successfully created on the branch lahodaj-backport-79069c5e in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk21. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk21:master, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 79069c5e from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jan Lahoda on 20 Jun 2023 and was reviewed by Jim Laskey.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk21:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk21.git lahodaj-backport-79069c5e:lahodaj-backport-79069c5e
$ git checkout lahodaj-backport-79069c5e
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk21.git lahodaj-backport-79069c5e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants