Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8310405: Linker.Option.firstVariadicArg should specify which index values are valid #14565

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

JornVernee
Copy link
Member

@JornVernee JornVernee commented Jun 20, 2023

Improve the specification of Linker.Option.firstVariadicArg, by specifying more clearly which index values are valid.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issues

  • JDK-8310405: Linker.Option.firstVariadicArg should specify which index values are valid (Enhancement - P3)
  • JDK-8310836: Linker.Option.firstVariadicArg should specify which index values are valid (CSR) (Withdrawn)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14565/head:pull/14565
$ git checkout pull/14565

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14565
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14565/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14565

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14565

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14565.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 20, 2023

👋 Welcome back jvernee! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 20, 2023

@JornVernee The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 20, 2023
@JornVernee JornVernee marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2023 15:31
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 20, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 20, 2023

Webrevs

@JornVernee JornVernee marked this pull request as draft June 20, 2023 16:37
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 20, 2023
@JornVernee JornVernee marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2023 19:48
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 20, 2023
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/Linker.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/Linker.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/foreign/Linker.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
*
* @param index the index of the first variadic argument layout in the function descriptor associated
* with a downcall linkage request.
* @param index the index indicating the start of the variadic arguments passed to the function described by
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My general feeling is that the previous text was better here. We describe in plenty details what this "index" is in the method javadoc. I think I'm more for reverting the changes here.

JornVernee and others added 3 commits June 24, 2023 01:51
Co-authored-by: Maurizio Cimadamore <54672762+mcimadamore@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Maurizio Cimadamore <54672762+mcimadamore@users.noreply.github.com>
@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jun 23, 2023
@JornVernee
Copy link
Member Author

I've addressed the review comments. I think we're converging so also went ahead and created the CSR for this.

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member Author

/csr unneeded

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jun 28, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2023

@JornVernee determined that a CSR request is not needed for this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2023

@JornVernee This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310405: Linker.Option.firstVariadicArg should specify which index values are valid

Reviewed-by: mcimadamore

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 120 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 28, 2023
@JornVernee
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2023

Going to push as commit 7fffdb5.
Since your change was applied there have been 120 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 28, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 28, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 28, 2023
@JornVernee JornVernee deleted the variadicIndexCheck branch June 28, 2023 17:32
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 28, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2023

@JornVernee Pushed as commit 7fffdb5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member Author

/backport jdk21

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2023

@JornVernee the backport was successfully created on the branch JornVernee-backport-7fffdb5e in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk21. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk21:master, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 7fffdb5e from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Jorn Vernee on 28 Jun 2023 and was reviewed by Maurizio Cimadamore.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk21:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk21.git JornVernee-backport-7fffdb5e:JornVernee-backport-7fffdb5e
$ git checkout JornVernee-backport-7fffdb5e
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk21.git JornVernee-backport-7fffdb5e

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants