-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8310494: Do not include constantPool.hpp from instanceKlass.hpp #14597
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8310494: Do not include constantPool.hpp from instanceKlass.hpp #14597
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
stefank
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this change looks fine (minus a couple of nits).
I do wonder if the code wouldn't be nicer if we simply removed these delegating functions in InstanceKlass and let the callers operate on the ConstantPool directly instead?
The version and signature logically belong to the class, so I think the functions should be part of InstanceKlass. The fact that they are stored inside the ConstantPool is just an implementation detail that can change. IIRC it was done this way because the ConstantPool can be stored in the read-only section of the CDS archive. |
stefank
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed. Left some nits that you could consider.
| // The constant pool is on stack if any of the methods are executing or | ||
| // referenced by handles. | ||
| bool on_stack() const { return _constants->on_stack(); } | ||
| virtual bool on_stack() const; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment looks weird now that the implementation, which delegates to the constant pool, has been moved from the header. I think the comment needs to be updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggest move the comment to the implementation.
|
@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
Going to push as commit bfcca5e.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
instanceKlass.hpp is needed quite frequently for HotSpot C++ sources, but constantPool.hpp is much less frequently.
This PR is the first step of reducing the inclusion of constantPool.hpp, by removing it from instanceKlass.hpp
I moved a bunch of inline functions into instanceKlass.cpp. These don't seem to be performance related.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14597/head:pull/14597$ git checkout pull/14597Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14597$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14597/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14597View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14597Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14597.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment