-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8310735: Build failure after JDK-8310577 with GCC8 #14627
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@DamonFool The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good and obviously do fix the build failure.
Thanks for taking care.
@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks @RealLucy for your quick review. Do you think it's trivial? |
I would guess so. Go ahead and integrate. |
Thanks @RealLucy . |
Going to push as commit e78fd46. |
@DamonFool Pushed as commit e78fd46. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing this.
Since
enum BasicType
had been changed toenum BasicType : u1
,basic_type >= 0
would be always true.So it's safe to remove such conditions in these asserts.
Thanks.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14627/head:pull/14627
$ git checkout pull/14627
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14627
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14627/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14627
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14627
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14627.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment