Skip to content

8310892: ScopedValue throwing StructureViolationException should be clearer #14679

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman commented Jun 27, 2023

Docs only update to add a missing @throws StructureViolationException and make it clearer when the exception is thrown. In the future we might re-visit this so that the description is in one place rather than in each method.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8311024 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8310892: ScopedValue throwing StructureViolationException should be clearer (Bug - P3)
  • JDK-8311024: ScopedValue throwing StructureViolationException should be clearer (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14679/head:pull/14679
$ git checkout pull/14679

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14679
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14679/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14679

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14679

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14679.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 27, 2023

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2023

@AlanBateman The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 27, 2023
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/csr

@AlanBateman AlanBateman marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2023 15:41
@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Jun 27, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2023

@AlanBateman has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.

@AlanBateman please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8310892 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 27, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the new text, it reads well. There's a typo that has been copy pasted several times however.

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

I like the new text, it reads well. There's a typo that has been copy pasted several times however.

Thanks, I noticed this when looking at the generated javadoc but didn't commit the change to fix. I'll fix it now.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jun 30, 2023
* but does not {@linkplain StructuredTaskScope#close() close} it, then it is detected
* as a <em>structure violation</em> when the operation completes (normally or with an
* exception). In that case, the underlying construct of the {@code StructuredTaskScope}
* is closed and {@link StructureViolationException} is thrown.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello Alan, does this mean that the original exception (if any) that caused the completion of the operation would be lost and the caller would instead receive just the StructureViolationException?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, it's just means the SVE is suppressed - see the discussion in the CSR.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2023

@AlanBateman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310892: ScopedValue throwing StructureViolationException should be clearer

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 06a1a15: 8311588: C2: RepeatCompilation compiler directive does not choose stress seed randomly
  • 581f90e: 8311604: Simplify NOCOOPS requested addresses for archived heap objects

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 10, 2023
Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2023

Going to push as commit 623cfcd.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 06a1a15: 8311588: C2: RepeatCompilation compiler directive does not choose stress seed randomly
  • 581f90e: 8311604: Simplify NOCOOPS requested addresses for archived heap objects

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2023

@AlanBateman Pushed as commit 623cfcd.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/backport jdk21

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 11, 2023

@AlanBateman the backport was successfully created on the branch AlanBateman-backport-623cfcd0 in my personal fork of openjdk/jdk21. To create a pull request with this backport targeting openjdk/jdk21:master, just click the following link:

➡️ Create pull request

The title of the pull request is automatically filled in correctly and below you find a suggestion for the pull request body:

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 623cfcd0 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Alan Bateman on 10 Jul 2023 and was reviewed by Daniel Fuchs and Jaikiran Pai.

Thanks!

If you need to update the source branch of the pull then run the following commands in a local clone of your personal fork of openjdk/jdk21:

$ git fetch https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk21.git AlanBateman-backport-623cfcd0:AlanBateman-backport-623cfcd0
$ git checkout AlanBateman-backport-623cfcd0
# make changes
$ git add paths/to/changed/files
$ git commit --message 'Describe additional changes made'
$ git push https://github.com/openjdk-bots/jdk21.git AlanBateman-backport-623cfcd0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants