Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8311084: Add typeSymbol() API for applicable constant pool entries #14706

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

liach
Copy link
Member

@liach liach commented Jun 29, 2023

5 Constant Pool entries, namely ConstantDynamicEntry, InvokeDynamicEntry, FieldRefEntry, MethodRefEntry, and InterfaceMethodRefEntry should have a typeSymbol() API to return the nominal/symbolic descriptor (ClassDesc or MethodTypeDesc).

This API is not added to NameAndTypeEntry itself, for a NameAndTypeEntry only knows if its type should be a field or method type from the other entries that refer to it.

This is one of the issues discussed in this mailing list thread: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/classfile-api-dev/2023-June/000381.html


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8311084: Add typeSymbol() API for applicable constant pool entries (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14706/head:pull/14706
$ git checkout pull/14706

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14706
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14706/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14706

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14706

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14706.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 29, 2023

👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2023

@liach The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 29, 2023
@liach liach marked this pull request as ready for review June 29, 2023 13:09
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 29, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 29, 2023

Webrevs

*/
default ClassDesc typeSymbol() {
return Util.fieldTypeSymbol(nameAndType());
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Usage of Util::fieldTypeSymbol in asSymbol() can be replaced with typeSymbol()

*/
default MethodTypeDesc typeSymbol() {
return Util.methodTypeSymbol(nameAndType());
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar comment as with CondyEntry -- reduce usage of Util::methodTypeSymbol in this class

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Would like to do the same in various ::count methods, but unfortunately MemberRefEntry is too general; would have to rejigger the various XxxRefEntry types.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which count methods are you referring to, Brian?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 29, 2023

@liach This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8311084: Add typeSymbol() API for applicable constant pool entries

Reviewed-by: briangoetz, asotona

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8412479: 8316229: Enhance class initialization logging
  • c04c9ea: 8316627: JViewport Test headless failure
  • 5cacf21: 8316156: ByteArrayInputStream.transferTo causes MaxDirectMemorySize overflow
  • 3461c7b: 8316532: Native library copying in BuildMicrobenchmark.gmk cause dups on macOS
  • 3301fb1: 8315869: UseHeavyMonitors not used
  • 54028e7: 8316562: serviceability/sa/jmap-hprof/JMapHProfLargeHeapTest.java times out after JDK-8314829
  • 7c991cc: 8296246: Update Unicode Data Files to Version 15.1.0
  • a021dbc: 8316149: Open source several Swing JTree JViewport KeyboardManager tests
  • 455cfae: 8315880: change LockingMode default from LM_LEGACY to LM_LIGHTWEIGHT
  • 9e00949: 8316427: Duplicated code for {obj,type}ArrayKlass::array_klass
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ec74194cb75afcaab2f77e8728391bb9104ccc73...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@briangoetz, @asotona) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 29, 2023
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 28, 2023

@liach This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 25, 2023

@liach This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Aug 25, 2023
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Sep 20, 2023

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Sep 20, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 20, 2023

@liach This pull request is now open

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Sep 20, 2023

@asotona Can you review this Classfile API utility addition?

Copy link
Member

@asotona asotona left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good, thanks for the patch.

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Sep 21, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2023

@liach
Your change (at version dd28873) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@asotona
Copy link
Member

asotona commented Sep 21, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2023

Going to push as commit 1749ba2.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9f5d2b9: 8316285: Opensource JButton manual tests
  • a35e96a: 8313612: Use JUnit in lib-test/jdk tests
  • bee7524: 8315786: [AIX] Build Disk Local Detection Issue with GNU-utils df on AIX
  • ceff47b: 8315082: [REDO] Generational ZGC: Tests crash with assert(index == 0 || is_power_of_2(index))
  • df4a25b: 8308762: Metaspace leak with Instrumentation.retransform
  • 8412479: 8316229: Enhance class initialization logging
  • c04c9ea: 8316627: JViewport Test headless failure
  • 5cacf21: 8316156: ByteArrayInputStream.transferTo causes MaxDirectMemorySize overflow
  • 3461c7b: 8316532: Native library copying in BuildMicrobenchmark.gmk cause dups on macOS
  • 3301fb1: 8315869: UseHeavyMonitors not used
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ec74194cb75afcaab2f77e8728391bb9104ccc73...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 21, 2023

@asotona @liach Pushed as commit 1749ba2.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants