8310988: Missing @since tags in java.management.rmi

[kevinjwalls]

Simple doc tag addition.

These are files which describe an interface that has been with us since 1.5. The files themselves were previously generated at build time, but have been in the repo since jdk15. But the API is since 1.5.

The other file mentioned in the bug is not a public class and has no javadoc generated, ignoring that one.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8310988: Missing @SInCE tags in java.management.rmi (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Roger Riggs (@RogerRiggs - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 5bc9cc12
• Alan Bateman (@AlanBateman - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 5bc9cc12
• Jonathan Gibbons (@jonathan-gibbons - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 5bc9cc12
• Hamlin Li (@Hamlin-Li - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to 5bc9cc12

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14714/head:pull/14714
$ git checkout pull/14714

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14714
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14714/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14714

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14714

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14714.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• jmx
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8310988: Missing @since tags in java.management.rmi

Reviewed-by: rriggs, alanb, jjg, mli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 2a9e2f6: 8311046: ProblemList gc/z/TestHighUsage.java with Generational ZGC
• 77e7b6d: 8311074: RISC-V: Fix -Wconversion warnings in some code header files
• 11fd34e: 8310241: OffsetDateTime compareTo redundant computation
• d979662: 8311115: Type in java.lang.reflect.AccessFlag.METHOD_PARAMETER
• a995aa6: 8310232: java.time.Clock$TickClock.millis() fails in runtime when tick is 1 microsecond
• 26efff7: 8309902: C2: assert(false) failed: Bad graph detected in build_loop_late after JDK-8305189
• 05c2b6c: 8309979: BootstrapMethods attribute is missing in class files recreated by SA
• 20f7d05: 8310502: Optimization for j.l.Long.fastUUID()
• 07734f6: 8310848: Convert ClassDesc and MethodTypeDesc to be stored in static final fields
• e5744b8: 8310919: runtime/ErrorHandling/TestAbortVmOnException.java times out due to core dumps taking a long time on OSX

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (634cc78d)
• 00: Full (5bc9cc12)

[AlanBateman]

Looks fine, I assume you'll bump the copyright date before integrating.

[kevinjwalls]

Looks fine, I assume you'll bump the copyright date before integrating.

Will do.

[kevinjwalls]

Thanks for the reviews!

[kevinjwalls]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 660cd25.
Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 2a9e2f6: 8311046: ProblemList gc/z/TestHighUsage.java with Generational ZGC
• 77e7b6d: 8311074: RISC-V: Fix -Wconversion warnings in some code header files
• 11fd34e: 8310241: OffsetDateTime compareTo redundant computation
• d979662: 8311115: Type in java.lang.reflect.AccessFlag.METHOD_PARAMETER
• a995aa6: 8310232: java.time.Clock$TickClock.millis() fails in runtime when tick is 1 microsecond
• 26efff7: 8309902: C2: assert(false) failed: Bad graph detected in build_loop_late after JDK-8305189
• 05c2b6c: 8309979: BootstrapMethods attribute is missing in class files recreated by SA
• 20f7d05: 8310502: Optimization for j.l.Long.fastUUID()
• 07734f6: 8310848: Convert ClassDesc and MethodTypeDesc to be stored in static final fields
• e5744b8: 8310919: runtime/ErrorHandling/TestAbortVmOnException.java times out due to core dumps taking a long time on OSX

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 660cd25.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.