Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8313875: Use literals instead of static fields in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown #14875

Closed

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Jul 13, 2023

Couple of static fields in Math are used only once and can be replaced with literals 0x1p512/0x1p-512


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8313875: Use literals instead of static fields in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown (Enhancement - P5)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14875/head:pull/14875
$ git checkout pull/14875

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14875
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14875/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14875

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14875

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14875.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 13, 2023

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2023

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 13, 2023
@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Make fields final in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown 8313875: Make fields final in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown Aug 7, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 7, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 7, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@cl4es cl4es left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and trivial.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 7, 2023

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8313875: Use literals instead of static fields in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown

Reviewed-by: redestad, darcy, bpb, rgiulietti

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 258 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7e20952: 8140326: G1: Consider putting regions where evacuation failed into next collection set
  • 28fd7a1: 8311179: Generational ZGC: gc/z/TestSmallHeap.java failed with OutOfMemoryError
  • a1115a7: 8312204: unexpected else with statement causes compiler crash
  • 87a6acb: 8313792: Verify 4th party information in src/jdk.internal.le/share/legal/jline.md
  • 87b08b6: 8307408: Some jdk/sun/tools/jhsdb tests don't pass test JVM args to the debuggee JVM
  • 83edffa: 8309663: test fails "assert(check_alignment(result)) failed: address not aligned: 0x00000008baadbabe"
  • 1da82a3: 8313702: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2023-08-02
  • 9c6eb67: 8313167: Update to use jtreg 7.3
  • 380418f: 8295058: test/langtools/tools/javac 116 test classes uses com.sun.tools.classfile library
  • 4726960: 8313779: RISC-V: use andn / orn in the MD5 instrinsic
  • ... and 248 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/af7f95e24ad5981c5de4b5dbf37da6f4f5e42129...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

static double twoToTheDoubleScaleUp = powerOfTwoD(512);
static double twoToTheDoubleScaleDown = powerOfTwoD(-512);
private static final double twoToTheDoubleScaleUp = powerOfTwoD(512);
private static final double twoToTheDoubleScaleDown = powerOfTwoD(-512);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't these the literals 0x1p512 and 0x1p-512, respectively?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoa. You are right.

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println(twoToTheDoubleScaleUp);
        System.out.println(twoToTheDoubleScaleDown);
        System.out.println(0x1p512);
        System.out.println(0x1p-512);

        System.out.println(twoToTheDoubleScaleUp == 0x1p512);
        System.out.println(twoToTheDoubleScaleDown == 0x1p-512);
    }
1.3407807929942597E154
7.458340731200207E-155
1.3407807929942597E154
7.458340731200207E-155
true
true

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These static fields seem to be used just once each, so we might as well just replace the usages with the literals and get rid of the fields.

…twoToTheDoubleScaleDown

completely remove the fields. Use literals instead.
@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title 8313875: Make fields final in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown 8313875: Use literals instead of static fields final in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown Aug 7, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Aug 7, 2023
@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title 8313875: Use literals instead of static fields final in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown 8313875: Use literals instead of static fields in java.util.Math: twoToTheDoubleScaleUp, twoToTheDoubleScaleDown Aug 7, 2023
@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM (not a Reviewer)

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

@rgiulietti you still can approve it officially, even if you are not a reviewer.
изображение

@rgiulietti
Copy link
Contributor

I know, but that's not an official review from the perspective of the OpenJDK, it's only a GitHub approval.
I find GitHub "reviews" confusing in the context of OpenJDK.
How would my GitHub approval help you in closing this PR?

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

turbanoff commented Aug 8, 2023

I know, but that's not an official review from the perspective of the OpenJDK, it's only a GitHub approval.

Actually OpenJDK bot uses Github approvals as a source. For example see this PR - #13213
Even I'm not a reviewer, my review is still listed in PR description and in the final commit message 30a140b
Reviewed-by: bpb, prr, aturbanov

How would my GitHub approval help you in closing this PR?

It's not directly related. You are right.

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Going to push as commit 41bdcde.
Since your change was applied there have been 259 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 091e65e: 8313552: Fix -Wconversion warnings in JFR code
  • 7e20952: 8140326: G1: Consider putting regions where evacuation failed into next collection set
  • 28fd7a1: 8311179: Generational ZGC: gc/z/TestSmallHeap.java failed with OutOfMemoryError
  • a1115a7: 8312204: unexpected else with statement causes compiler crash
  • 87a6acb: 8313792: Verify 4th party information in src/jdk.internal.le/share/legal/jline.md
  • 87b08b6: 8307408: Some jdk/sun/tools/jhsdb tests don't pass test JVM args to the debuggee JVM
  • 83edffa: 8309663: test fails "assert(check_alignment(result)) failed: address not aligned: 0x00000008baadbabe"
  • 1da82a3: 8313702: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2023-08-02
  • 9c6eb67: 8313167: Update to use jtreg 7.3
  • 380418f: 8295058: test/langtools/tools/javac 116 test classes uses com.sun.tools.classfile library
  • ... and 249 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/af7f95e24ad5981c5de4b5dbf37da6f4f5e42129...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 8, 2023

@turbanoff Pushed as commit 41bdcde.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants