-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8312077: Fix signed integer overflow, final part #14883
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dlong! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@dean-long The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
@dean-long This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
My tier10 testing is still running, so I may add a few more fixes to this. I just added one in c1_Compilation.cpp. |
@offamitkumar @TheRealMDoerr @RealFYang @bulasevich please check that I haven't broken the s390/ppc/riscv/arm32 ports. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't see any s390-specific code change here. Still tested fastdebug & release builds.
Looks Good.
FYI: Performed tier1, tier2 and tier3 tests on linux-riscv64 platform. Result is clean. |
Thanks Vladimir, Andrew, @RealFYang and @offamitkumar. |
Hi, the change looks good for me. ARM32 tests are OK. |
Thanks @bulasevich. |
I'm still waiting on some tier10 tests that take 7 days to complete. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit d0761c1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@dean-long Pushed as commit d0761c1. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This is hopefully the last set of integer overflow fixes for hotspot. Some of the counters I changed to unsigned are updated in platform-specific code, so I could use some help testing on arm, ppc, riscv, and s390.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14883/head:pull/14883
$ git checkout pull/14883
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14883
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14883/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14883
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14883
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14883.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment