Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8312077: Fix signed integer overflow, final part #14883

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

dean-long
Copy link
Member

@dean-long dean-long commented Jul 14, 2023

This is hopefully the last set of integer overflow fixes for hotspot. Some of the counters I changed to unsigned are updated in platform-specific code, so I could use some help testing on arm, ppc, riscv, and s390.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8312077: Fix signed integer overflow, final part (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14883/head:pull/14883
$ git checkout pull/14883

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/14883
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14883/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 14883

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 14883

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14883.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 14, 2023

👋 Welcome back dlong! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8312077: Fix signed integer overflow, final part 8312077: Fix signed integer overflow, final part Jul 14, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 14, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2023

@dean-long The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 14, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 14, 2023

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2023

@dean-long This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8312077: Fix signed integer overflow, final part

Reviewed-by: kvn, amitkumar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 19691fa: 6361826: (reflect) provide method for mapping strings to class object for primitive types
  • c84866a: 8310551: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/interrupt/interrupt001/interrupt001.java timed out due to missing prompt
  • 0d2196f: 8311992: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/JfrEvents::testVirtualThreadPinned failed
  • f3b96f6: 8311862: RISC-V: small improvements to shift immediate instructions
  • a63f865: 8311946: add support for libgraal specific jtreg tests
  • 167d1c1: 8311986: Disable runtime/os/TestTracePageSizes.java for ShenandoahGC
  • 7539cc0: 8303134: JFR: Missing stack trace during chunk rotation stress
  • d1fa1a8: 8311825: Duplicate qualified enum constants not detected
  • 4676b40: 8312049: runtime/logging/ClassLoadUnloadTest can be improved
  • bbb7ce5: 8311038: Incorrect exhaustivity computation
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c7c6d47a07100f6c81af6cfad301ec1bda77adf7...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 14, 2023
@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

My tier10 testing is still running, so I may add a few more fixes to this. I just added one in c1_Compilation.cpp.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

@offamitkumar @TheRealMDoerr @RealFYang @bulasevich please check that I haven't broken the s390/ppc/riscv/arm32 ports.

Copy link
Member

@offamitkumar offamitkumar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn't see any s390-specific code change here. Still tested fastdebug & release builds.

Looks Good.

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member

@offamitkumar @TheRealMDoerr @RealFYang @bulasevich please check that I haven't broken the s390/ppc/riscv/arm32 ports.

FYI: Performed tier1, tier2 and tier3 tests on linux-riscv64 platform. Result is clean.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Vladimir, Andrew, @RealFYang and @offamitkumar.

@bulasevich
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, the change looks good for me. ARM32 tests are OK.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @bulasevich.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

I'm still waiting on some tier10 tests that take 7 days to complete.

@dean-long
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2023

Going to push as commit d0761c1.
Since your change was applied there have been 114 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2bdfa83: 8262742: (fs) Add Path::resolve with varargs string
  • 8008e27: 8308903: Print detailed info for Java objects in -Xlog:cds+map
  • d8f2e9a: 8310530: PipedOutputStream.flush() accesses sink racily
  • fac9f88: 8311631: When multiple users run tools/jpackage/share/LicenseTest.java, Permission denied for writing /var/tmp/*.files
  • d5c6b0d: 8311261: [AIX] TestAlwaysPreTouchStacks.java fails due to java.lang.RuntimeException: Did not find expected NMT output
  • d1cc278: 8311822: AIX : test/jdk/java/foreign/TestLayouts.java fails because of different output - expected [i4] but found [I4]
  • 3caf64e: 8309238: jdk/jfr/tool/TestView.java failed with "exitValue = 134"
  • 298dda4: 8301457: Code in SendPortZero.java is uncommented even after JDK-8236852 was fixed
  • 7dd4799: 8311847: Fix -Wconversion for assembler.hpp emit_int8,16 callers
  • 197981b: 8311881: jdk/javax/swing/ProgressMonitor/ProgressTest.java does not show the ProgressMonitorInputStream all the time
  • ... and 104 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c7c6d47a07100f6c81af6cfad301ec1bda77adf7...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 24, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2023

@dean-long Pushed as commit d0761c1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants