Skip to content

8313368: (fc) FileChannel.size returns 0 on block special files #15092

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bplb
Copy link
Member

@bplb bplb commented Jul 31, 2023

Reinstate header files so that BLKGETSIZE64 is defined on Linux.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8313368: (fc) FileChannel.size returns 0 on block special files (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15092/head:pull/15092
$ git checkout pull/15092

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15092
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15092/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15092

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15092

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15092.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 31, 2023

👋 Welcome back bpb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@bplb
Copy link
Member Author

bplb commented Jul 31, 2023

The proposed fix was verified manually using the test attached to the issue.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 31, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 31, 2023

@bplb The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the nio nio-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 31, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 31, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vyommani vyommani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me, i tested at my Linux box(Ubuntu-22.0.4) and fix is working as expected.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 1, 2023

@bplb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8313368: (fc) FileChannel.size returns 0 on block special files

Reviewed-by: vtewari, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ec2f38f: 8313428: GHA: Bump GCC versions for July 2023 updates
  • 98a915a: 8313256: Exclude failing multicast tests on AIX
  • 94b50b7: 8313404: Fix section label in test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
  • ee3e091: 8313249: Fix -Wconversion warnings in verifier code
  • e36960e: 8312420: Integrate Graal's blender micro benchmark
  • 0a3c6d6: 8280482: Window transparency bug on Linux
  • c91a300: 8307312: Replace "int which" with "int cp_index" in constantPool
  • 6af0af5: 8310913: Move ReferencedKeyMap to jdk.internal so it may be shared
  • 86783b9: 8301996: Move field resolution information out of the cpCache

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 1, 2023
@bplb
Copy link
Member Author

bplb commented Aug 2, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 2, 2023

Going to push as commit 4ba81f6.
Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 2, 2023

@bplb Pushed as commit 4ba81f6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@bplb bplb deleted the UnixFileDispatcherImpl-8313368 branch August 4, 2023 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants